Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RAULS Jackson | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 2 | SILVA Daniel | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | RICH Jack | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LOGGINS Austin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | EDWARDS Darby | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 6 | ANDRIEUX Ryan | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | BOND Christopher D. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 9 | WALLACE Cade | V V V D V V | V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 10 | JAYASANKAR Hari | V V D V V | V | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | LU Caleb | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | PROGRESSOV Dmitrii | D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 13 | CROWLEY James | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | KIM Alex T. | V V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | GRAHAM Ian | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | CHEN Andrew | D V D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | KELLNER Taylor | V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | ARDOIN Cameron | D V V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 20 | WOOD Mitchell | D V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | WEATHERLY Andrew | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | CONREY Chris | V V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | DALTON Harrison | V D D D V V | V | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | NYSTROM Sofia | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | HSU Tammy | V D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | LIU Iris | D D V D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 27 | ROBINSON Wesley | D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | V V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | LE Tan | D V D V D D | V D | 5.0 | 2 | -3.0 |
| 31 | SON Daniel | V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | DELPH Spencer | V D D D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 33 | BOWE Trey | D D D V V | D | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 |
| 34 | YU Johnathan | D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 35 | KALE Omkar | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 36 | SANDERS Brittany | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 37 | VIDRINE Odile | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 39 | ROBINSON Tristen | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 40 | NEWCOMER Rose | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 41 | WEST Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 42 | YANG Jenny | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 43 | PRICE Walter | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 44 | GUAN Yuejun | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.