Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RAULS Jackson | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 38% | |
| 2 | SILVA Daniel | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 3 | RICH Jack | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 3 | LOGGINS Austin | - | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 16% | |
| 5 | EDWARDS Darby | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 6 | ANDRIEUX Ryan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 8 | BOND Christopher D. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
| 9 | WALLACE Cade | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 10 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 17% | 2% | |
| 11 | LU Caleb | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 12 | PROGRESSOV Dmitrii | 9% | 44% | 36% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 13 | CROWLEY James | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 34% | 6% | |
| 14 | KIM Alex T. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 15 | GRAHAM Ian | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 16 | CHEN Andrew | - | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | KELLNER Taylor | - | 1% | 17% | 49% | 32% | ||
| 19 | ARDOIN Cameron | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 43% | 13% | |
| 20 | WOOD Mitchell | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 1% | 11% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | WEATHERLY Andrew | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 23 | CONREY Chris | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | DALTON Harrison | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 25 | NYSTROM Sofia | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 26 | HSU Tammy | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 3% | |
| 27 | LIU Iris | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | ROBINSON Wesley | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | ||
| 29 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | LE Tan | - | - | < 1% | 2% | 19% | 54% | 24% |
| 31 | SON Daniel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | ||
| 32 | DELPH Spencer | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 33 | BOWE Trey | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | YU Johnathan | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | KALE Omkar | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | SANDERS Brittany | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | VIDRINE Odile | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | CREVELING Kathryn | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | ROBINSON Tristen | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | NEWCOMER Rose | 58% | 35% | 7% | - | - | ||
| 41 | WEST Matthew | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | YANG Jenny | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | PRICE Walter | 13% | 41% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | GUAN Yuejun | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.