Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUCEBA Vitalijs | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | PARACKA Eric D. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | JORGENSEN Alexander | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 3 | KUCEBA Nikita | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | YOON Nicholas | V V V V | V V | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 7 | BOLDOR Maria | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 8 | RUDOLPH Max B. | V V D D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 9 | KIM Alex T. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 10 | BOUIE Jacob | V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | WEN George C. | D V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 12 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 13 | PARK Kevin Y. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 14 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | V D V V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | VIVEROS Evan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 16 | LIM Samuel | D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 18 | DONDERIS AJ | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | JEWETT Jamie | V D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | OH Sean | V V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 23 | CHAPARRO Alejandra | D V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 24 | SAGE Michael P. | D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | TRAN Andrew T. | V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 26 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 27 | KILLOUGH Klayton | D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 28 | NOVIKOV Sienna | V D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 29 | BUCHENHORST Anton | V V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 30 | MCGUIRE gavin | D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | BURNS Andrew | D V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 32 | BOHDAN Samuel | D D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 33 | WILLIAMS-HOWE Sydney | V D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 34 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | D D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 35 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 37 | EDWARDS Darby | D D D V V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 38 | WATKINS Christopher M. | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 39 | VIVEROS Antonio | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | ANDERSON Sidney E. | D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 41 | LINDSEY Duncan | D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 42 | GOEBEL Alexander | V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 43 | MINSHEW Dustin | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 44 | ANDRESS Joseph | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | YOO Kristie | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 46 | SOLEYMANI Jennifer | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 49 | JOHNSON Nicholas | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 50 | LIOTTA Madison | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 51 | MCARTHUR Kemp | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 52 | MATSUNAGA Alysa | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 52 | JONES Malachi | D D D D D D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 | |
| 54 | WONG Gabriella | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.