Tennessee Recreation Center for Students - Knoxville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | DOELEMAN Zeno | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 58% |
2 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
3 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
3 | MCGRATH Russell D. | - | 1% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 8% |
5 | MUNLIN Donovan | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
6 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
6 | PARNAS Ely | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
8 | JUNG Minche | - | - | 7% | 32% | 51% | 10% |
9 | BLAND Ian A. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 34% |
10 | RUTHERFURD John (Trace) | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% |
10 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | 1% | 13% | 48% | 34% | 5% |
12 | YI Daniel | 4% | 34% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - |
13 | WHITLEY Gary L. | 1% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
14 | SHELANDER Connor | 7% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
15 | CHAN Tyler | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
16 | ENDERLE Alexis N. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
17 | AL-TAYEB Ahmed M. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% |
18 | CAI Brian | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 46% |
19 | PRICE Wade | 36% | 51% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
20 | DORSETT Elizabeth | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
21 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | 1% | 9% | 35% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
22 | ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
23 | LIM Joshua | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
24 | DULISSE Alex | - | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
25 | NAIK Saininad | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
26 | HAYES Zackery | 50% | 42% | 8% | - | - | - |
27 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
28 | LENAHAN Conor J. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
29 | KEMLE Brian | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.