Guilford High School - Guilford, CT, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CRALEY Thomas M. | V V V V | V V V V V | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 2 | BREIER Matthew F. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | FRITZ Ayden R. | V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 4 | VALENTON Timothy | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 5 | HILMER Michael | V V V V | V V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 7 | BRINTON III Robert H. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | WEI William | V V V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 9 | BOYLE Aiden P. | V V D V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 10 | EWEN Jacob | V V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | SABETTA Ethan | V V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 12 | ROTHCHILD Matthew | V V V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 13 | MASON Seth | V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 14 | BAKER Thomas | V D V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 16 | BRAND Sebastien | D V V V D | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 17 | REDWOOD Peter | V V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 18 | LEETE Carter | V D V V | V | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 19 | BUTLER Nathan | D D V V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | ALBERT Matthew | D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 22 | CRICCO Nicholas | D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 24 | SMOTROFF Joshua L. | D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | SISON Ryan | D V V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | KEANNA Peter | D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | CIPRIANO Jacob | V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | DESCHENES Nolan | D D D V | V | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 28 | PINKOWISH Alexander | V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 32 | RUSSELL Alec | D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 33 | NEWTON Luke | V V D V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 34 | MACKENZIE Finnian | D V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 | |
| 35 | MORELLO Lucas | V V D V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 | |
| 36 | GRESH Samuel | V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 39 | BRYANT Adam | V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 40 | LABELLE Zachary | V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 41 | BACHOFNER Zachary | D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 42 | BELL Christopher | D V D V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 43 | BUTLER Zach | V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 45 | NELSON Daniel | D V V D D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 49 | BONALDO Nicholas | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 51 | LUO Liangzhao (Ziv) | D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 52 | CECARELLI Andrew | D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 53 | LIN Ruiwen | D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 54 | DONG Liangtong (Thomas) | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 55 | TRAVERSO Ben | V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 58 | DVORAK Ryan | D D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 59 | GRECZKOWSKI Noah | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
| 60 | LEITZINGER Timothy | D D D V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 | |
| 61 | BOBINSKI Lenny | D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 63 | TOMKO Jeremy | D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 64 | BRUNSON Benjamin | D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 65 | PALAGONIA Owen | D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
| 66 | CARSON Owen | D D D D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 | |
| 67 | KIM Luke | D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
| 67 | PENDLETON Noah | D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.