San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% | |
| 2 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 3 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 3 | RAPYNETS Alina | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 5 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 5 | MOSKOVSKAYA Anastasiya | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 7 | OH Erin H. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 8 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 9 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 15% | |
| 10 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 11 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 12 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 36% | 7% | |
| 14 | KONG Olivia | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% | |
| 15 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 16 | WU Renee | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 17 | YIN Helen | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 18 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 19 | TRAN Ava D. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 20 | IBEN Claire L. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 16% | |
| 21 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 22 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 35% | 6% | |
| 23 | MING Yue | 1% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 24 | CHENG Lydia A. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 28 | PENG Amber L. | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | KOSLOW Amicie | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Robin | 9% | 43% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | XU Marie-Anne J. | - | 17% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | BHATT Morgane | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 34 | SHIH Diane | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 35 | LEE Isabelle | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 10% | 34% | 39% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | LEE Bethanie | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 38 | HSIUNG Samantha | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | |
| 40 | VOHRA Anusha | 1% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | HWANG Jungmin | 4% | 35% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | UMAP Arna | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FRANK Lauren | 3% | 31% | 41% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 3% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | WELBORN Calissa | 3% | 27% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | TOM Caitlyn | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 26% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 48 | YANG Alice | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HO Rachel E. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | WATERS Samantha M. | 37% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | CHUANG Jocelyn | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | PATTERSON Natalia | 63% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | PITCHER Katherine "Kacey" | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 91% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | MEDRANO Sue | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.