San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 2 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | |
| 3 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 3 | RAPYNETS Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 15% | |
| 5 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 5 | MOSKOVSKAYA Anastasiya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 7 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% | |
| 8 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 9 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 15% | |
| 10 | YEH Marissa E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 11 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 12 | LAU Chloe M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 13 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 7% | |
| 14 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 6% | |
| 15 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 10% |
| 16 | WU Renee | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
| 17 | YIN Helen | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 18 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 19 | TRAN Ava D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
| 20 | IBEN Claire L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% | |
| 21 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 22 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 6% | |
| 23 | MING Yue | 100% | 99% | 74% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | CHENG Lydia A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 27 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 28 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 29 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Robin | 100% | 91% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | XU Marie-Anne J. | 100% | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 33 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
| 34 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
| 35 | LEE Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 36 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 37 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | |
| 38 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | ALTEN Ayaka | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 40 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 99% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | HWANG Jungmin | 100% | 96% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 43 | FRANK Lauren | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 100% | 97% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 97% | 70% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 100% | 74% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 48 | YANG Alice | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 50 | WATERS Samantha M. | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | CHUANG Jocelyn | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | PITCHER Katherine "Kacey" | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 55 | MEDRANO Sue | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.