San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 2 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 20% | |
| 3 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
| 3 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% | |
| 5 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 23% | |
| 6 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 41% | |
| 7 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 8 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 9 | CHU Audrey | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 10 | WILEY Erica | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 11 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 12 | QURESHI Aafreen | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 13 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 10% | 34% | 40% | 16% | |
| 14 | JIN Jasmine | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 15 | ERTAS Eileen | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 23% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHANG Heidi | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 5% |
| 17 | HEPLER Sarah | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | RYAN Minhuey | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% | |
| 20 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 21 | SOIN Anika A. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 22 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | STOJANOVIC Mina | - | 2% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 6% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Chuyi | 1% | 12% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | PACHECO Naomi | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LI Charlotte | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 29 | LYNCH Kristin A. | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 7% | |
| 30 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 31 | HAU Olivia | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KULASOORIYA Sonia | 20% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | FELAND Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SCHMID Carola K. | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 37 | YIN Grace | 12% | 52% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HABERMAN Hailey | 22% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 40 | BONDAR Nika | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | LOUIE Sarah | 67% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | MUNEYB Muntaha Sana | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | RICH Caroline B. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | KULASOORIYA Sofia | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 27% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | LIN Ashley | 68% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | STANICA Teodora O. | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | GUPTA Sanya | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SHI Ava | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.