San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 2 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 20% | |
| 3 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 5 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 6 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 7 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 8 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 9 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 10 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% | |
| 11 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 12 | QURESHI Aafreen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 13 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 56% | 16% | |
| 14 | JIN Jasmine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | ERTAS Eileen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHANG Heidi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
| 17 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | RYAN Minhuey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
| 20 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 21 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 22 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Chuyi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | PACHECO Naomi | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | |
| 29 | LYNCH Kristin A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
| 30 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 31 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | KULASOORIYA Sonia | 100% | 80% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 33 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 35 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SCHMID Carola K. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
| 37 | YIN Grace | 100% | 88% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | DANIEL Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
| 40 | BONDAR Nika | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 33% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | MUNEYB Muntaha Sana | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 43 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | NANTON SHYAMALA M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | KULASOORIYA Sofia | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 47 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 100% | 73% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | STANICA Teodora O. | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | GUPTA Sanya | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 51 | SHI Ava | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.