UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MENKE Kavya I. | - | - | 6% | 31% | 48% | 14% | |
| 2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 38% | 6% | |
| 3 | DU Gavin J. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 20% | |
| 3 | FONZO Ian | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 5 | LISSO Ria A. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 24% | |
| 6 | RICH Jack | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 7 | WALLACE Cade | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 8 | RAULS Jackson V. | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 9 | EDWARDS Darby | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 46% | 12% |
| 10 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 11 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 12 | LU Caleb Q. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% |
| 13 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
| 14 | RICHERSON James | - | 5% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
| 15 | LOGGINS Austin J. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 16 | DAWSON Todd | - | 3% | 38% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | CROWLEY James | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
| 18 | PATEL Jeet | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 19 | GRAHAM Ian | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 3% | |
| 20 | HAMILL Daniel | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | |
| 21 | SANDERS Brittany | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | HE Nikaia | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 23 | BOONE Jason | - | 6% | 31% | 46% | 15% | 1% | |
| 24 | ROBINSON Wesley | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | HOLDER Thomas | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | KIEU Jimmy | 5% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | GIRARD Parker | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | VIDRINE Odile | 12% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Andy | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 31 | DESHETLER Scott | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | 23% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | CHEN Ethan | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LIU Iris | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 8% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 36% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | OZMER Joseph | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | CONREY Chris | 41% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | CREVELING Kathryn | 12% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 43 | CHO Kyung Jin | 4% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.