UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MENKE Kavya I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 14% | |
2 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 6% | |
3 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
3 | FONZO Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
5 | LISSO Ria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 24% | |
6 | RICH Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
7 | WALLACE Cade | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
8 | RAULS Jackson V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | 4% | |
9 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 12% |
10 | DICKINSON Leonard H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
11 | KELLNER Taylor T. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
12 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 6% |
13 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
14 | RICHERSON James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% | |
15 | LOGGINS Austin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
16 | DAWSON Todd | 100% | 100% | 97% | 60% | 17% | 2% | |
17 | CROWLEY James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 7% |
18 | PATEL Jeet | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
19 | GRAHAM Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 3% | |
20 | HAMILL Daniel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
21 | SANDERS Brittany | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
22 | HE Nikaia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
23 | BOONE Jason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% | 1% | |
24 | ROBINSON Wesley | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
25 | JAYASANKAR Hari | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
26 | HOLDER Thomas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
27 | KIEU Jimmy | 100% | 95% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
28 | GIRARD Parker | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
29 | VIDRINE Odile | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
30 | WANG Andy | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
31 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | HOLEVINSKI Anthony | 100% | 77% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
35 | ORLOFSKY Sydney | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | |
36 | LIU Iris | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
37 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
38 | TAYLOR Kathleen | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | OZMER Joseph | 100% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
40 | SCHIPPER Bonnie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
41 | CONREY Chris | 100% | 59% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | CREVELING Kathryn | 100% | 88% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
43 | CHO Kyung Jin | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.