UNG Gainesville PE Complex - Gainesville, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | FAYEZ Sherif | V D V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
2 | MALLOY Patrick G. | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
3 | CAI Brian | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
3 | KIM Ethan J. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
5 | FULLERTON Houston T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
6 | KIM Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
7 | SHIN Sung (Andy) | V V D V V V | V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
8 | TINSLEY Cole | D V V D V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
9 | DOELEMAN Zeno | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
10 | MUNLIN Donovan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
11 | MCINTYRE Kendric J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | BENATER Lauren | V D V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
14 | PARK Jong-Eun | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
15 | JANG Jaeho (Jason) | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
16 | JUNG Minche | D V D V D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
17 | FAYEZ Ahmed A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
18 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | SMITH Jett A. | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
20 | SWENSON Keane J. | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
21 | GILBRETH Geoffrey (Chance) | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | MARTIN Anthony (AJ) J. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
23 | JACKSON James | V D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | JOSEPH William | D V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | BAKER Julian L. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
26 | TRAVAGLINO Stefano | V V V V D D | V D | 5.6 | 4 | -1.6 |
27 | CHO Tyler H. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
28 | GUNDUBOGULA Raj | D V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
29 | YIM Nathan H. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
30 | NORMAN Christian | D D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
31 | PAK Matthew | V D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
32 | DOMKAM Alan W. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
33 | PARNAS Ely | V V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
34 | BENDER Rhys T. | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
35 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | V D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
36 | MISKELL William | D V V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
37 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | V V D V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
38 | SCHNEIDER Allen J. | V D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
39 | SHAH Anuj | D V V V V D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
39 | JAAFAR Youssef | V V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
41 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
42 | GUO Shuliang | D V D V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
43 | SPANGENBERG Joshua K. | V V D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
44 | PARNAS Apollo | V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
45 | HAN David | V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
46 | LIM Joshua | D V D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
47 | WEBSTER Davis G. | V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
48 | GILBRETH Miles S. | V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | MA Bochen | D V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
50 | CHAKRABORTY Rishi N. | V D D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
51 | LABROZZI Aidan | V V V D D D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
52 | VALES Keyan | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
53 | TISON John D. | V V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
53 | JARVIS Trent | D D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
55 | LEE Kennith | D D V D V V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
56 | MCGRATH Russell D. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
57 | MERMIGKAS John | V V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
58 | SONG Ervin | D V D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
59 | MARKS Luke | D V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
60 | DULISSE ALeX | D D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
61 | CHRONISTER Charles | V V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
62 | LANGE Eric A. | V D D D D V | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
63 | JIANG Hannah S. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
64 | PINCKNEY John F. | V D D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
65 | EVANS Grant | D D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
66 | MEYERS Jory B. | D V D V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
67 | FLOYD Sean C. | D V V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
68 | MAIER Elijah B. | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
69 | DAVIS Campbell | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
70 | CRISTIAN Ana | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
71 | TAUBLER Michelle | D D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
72 | MOON Seojung | D D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
73 | LENAHAN Conor J. | D D V D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
74 | LIU Eric | D V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
75 | CHAN Tyler | D D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
76 | DORSETT Elizabeth | D D D D V V | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 | |
77 | ASH Neil | D D V D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
78 | PROCTER Jonathan R. | D D D V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 | |
79 | EDWARDS Darby | V D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
79 | LAZCANO TORRES Luis | D D D V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
81 | YI Daniel | D V D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
82 | MERRIMAN Morgan | V D D D D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
83 | WANG Aidan | D V D D D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
84 | WAGNER Lyndsay K. | V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
85 | ZIMINSKY Karel M. | V D D D D D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 | |
86 | LE Tan | V D D D D D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 | |
86 | RICKMAN II Samuel B. | D D V D D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
88 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | V D D D D D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 | |
89 | LORES Alicia | D D D V D D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 | |
90 | KEMLE Brian | D D V D D D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
91 | BRANDS Michael W. | D V D D D D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 | |
92 | RAFF Kaleb | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
93 | DEWITT Sarah | D D D D D D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 | |
94 | FITZPATRICK Ryan | D D D D D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 | |
94 | PRICE Wade | D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
96 | HAYES Zackery | D D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
97 | ALVARENGA Darby | D D D D D D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 | |
98 | ALMUHAWAS Abdulmohsen | D D D D D D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 | |
99 | PUVALOWSKI Ryan | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.