Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BERMAN Luca | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 2 | WILSON Jude | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | MORRILL William | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | DENG Andrew | V V D D D V | V V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 5 | MORRILL Justin | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | V V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 7 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 7 | BLEYMAN David | V V V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 9 | EDELMAN Seth A. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 10 | SAVOY Luca | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | ELIN Adam E. | V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | HONG Vincent Q. | V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 13 | HO Kaden M. | V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 14 | UH Daniel | V D V D V | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 15 | ZHENG Edward L. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | KIM Shaun M. | V D D D V | V V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 17 | BROU Inkosi | V V D V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 18 | WEBER Mattias A. | V V V V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 19 | OVERDECK Andrew | D D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | HUANG Tom | V V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 21 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | HAN Daniel Y. | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | V V V D D D | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | PIWOWAR Alex | V D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 25 | ZENG Noah | D D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 26 | MICHNA Colin P. | D V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 27 | WONG Ryan | V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | ALTIRS Alexander | D D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | HUANG Tyler T. | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 30 | SHTEYN Mark | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 31 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 32 | POSY Daniel | V D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 33 | HUANG Maxwell H. | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 35 | WANG Robert | D D D V D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 36 | DOLAN Charles R. | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 37 | BRIDGES Benjamin | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | BIDWELL Ryder | D D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 39 | TANG Charles | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 40 | SANDERS Samuel B. | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 41 | LEONARD Charles | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 42 | MICLAUS Justin | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 43 | MOULTON Ian | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 44 | MORALES Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.