Rocky Point, NY - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BERMAN Luca | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | |
2 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
3 | MORRILL William | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
3 | DENG Andrew | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 4% |
5 | MORRILL Justin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
6 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
7 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
7 | BLEYMAN David | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
9 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
10 | SAVOY Luca | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
11 | ELIN Adam E. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
12 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
13 | HO Kaden M. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
14 | UH Daniel | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | |
15 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
16 | KIM Shaun M. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
17 | BROU Inkosi | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
18 | WEBER Mattias A. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
19 | OVERDECK Andrew | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | HUANG Tom | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
22 | HAN Daniel Y. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
23 | NOURELDIN Gabriel | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
24 | PIWOWAR Alex | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
25 | ZENG Noah | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
26 | MICHNA Colin P. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
27 | WONG Ryan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% | |
27 | ALTIRS Alexander | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | |
29 | HUANG Tyler T. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
30 | SHTEYN Mark | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
31 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
32 | POSY Daniel | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
34 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
35 | WANG Robert | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
36 | DOLAN Charles R. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
37 | BRIDGES Benjamin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
38 | BIDWELL Ryder | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
39 | TANG Charles | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
41 | LEONARD Charles | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | MICLAUS Justin | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
43 | MOULTON Ian | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
44 | MORALES Jonathan | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.