San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LIN Dashiell | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
2 | LO Conrad | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
3 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
5 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
7 | YEE Johnathan | V V V D V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
8 | DETERING Julian | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | CHUANG Kian J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
10 | HOSKERI Anik S. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
11 | NG Kenneth | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
12 | WOO Christian | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | WANG Ethan | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
14 | MU Jeffrey | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | TEH Ryan | V V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
16 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V D D V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
17 | SEEDS Edward T. | V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
18 | LI Jett | V D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
19 | WILT Daniel E. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
20 | FINNEY Lorenz | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | BAEK David | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | CHENG Jonathan | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
23 | WHITE Austin M. | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
24 | HUSSAIN Ismail A. | V D V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
25 | SHEN Owen | V V V D D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
26 | HUSSAIN Ibrahim | D V V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
27 | RANJITH Yash M. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
28 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
29 | NG Eben S. | V D V V D D | V D | 5.5 | 3 | -2.5 |
30 | WU Lucas | D V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
31 | CHEN Justin K. | D D V V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
32 | RUBIN Max | D D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
33 | MYERS Dean | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | HARRIS Otto | V V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
35 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
36 | KHER Roan | D D V V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
37 | TUAN Evan | V V D D V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
38 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | V V D D D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
39 | LEVY Jacob | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
40 | PETERSON Lucas | V D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
41 | CHU Colin | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
42 | YU Leo | D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
43 | HE Bu Wei O. | D D D V V D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
44 | HIGHTOWER Palmer | V D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
45 | GETSIN Anthony | D D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
46 | LIN Richard | D V V D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
47 | WACHTEL Oliver | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
48 | GERA Kaveer | D D D V D V | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
49 | BACHER Richard | D V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
50 | FLIGOR William | D D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
51 | WYMAN Julian | V D D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
52 | SMITH Grant D. | D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
53 | AGRAWAL Niki | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | D V D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
55 | MAK Osman K. | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
56 | FANG Jaden | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
57 | MIN Lucas | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
58 | ZHANG Luke | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
59 | BUFIY Aeneas | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
60 | MANDAL Souptik | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
61 | LIU William | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
62 | BOUCHARD Kai | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
63 | ZENG Chuyi | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
63 | BHARDWAJ Kush | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
65 | EDISON Ansel | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
66 | ZHOU Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
67 | BHARDWAJ Kayshav | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.