San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 39% |
| 2 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 44% | |
| 3 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 3 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 5 | SHIH Diane | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 48% | |
| 6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% | |
| 7 | HO Rachel E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% |
| 8 | KOSLOW Amicie | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% | |
| 9 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 10 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | - | 9% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 11 | KONG Olivia | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 12 | WELBORN Calissa | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 13 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
| 14 | FERNANDES Thea | - | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
| 15 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% | |
| 16 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 17 | UMAP Arna | - | 6% | 29% | 43% | 20% | 2% | |
| 18 | HOBSON Ava | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
| 19 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 48% | 23% |
| 20 | HSIUNG Samantha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 21 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% | |
| 22 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 40% | 11% | |
| 23 | OHALLORAN Zoe | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 24 | NAIR Supriya | 1% | 13% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | SHEKAR ANUVA | 1% | 10% | 39% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | ZHANG Eunice | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | FUNG Emma | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 28 | GONG Chloe | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LEE Bethanie | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 41% | 12% | |
| 30 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 4% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 3% | |
| 31 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
| 32 | ZHENG Zoe | 5% | 27% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | FUNG Vera | 9% | 39% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 32% | 4% | |
| 36 | BARRON Isabella | 2% | 19% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 37 | MANN Sophia J. | 7% | 39% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | WANG Celine S. | 1% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 39 | GREEN Perri L. | 12% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | VO Bao-Vy | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | THOMAS Saejel | 9% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | VINOD Amaya N. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | LUH Mia P. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 44 | ENRILE Erica | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | LIU Jessica | 65% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | HO Kristen | 44% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | DAYAL Saahira | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | NICKOLOV Nora | 27% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 49 | PENG Serena | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 10% | 49% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | SALAMATI Soraya A. | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | BACCARI Isabella M. | 26% | 51% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | ZHOU Aria | 55% | 37% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | MU Allison | 15% | 54% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | PATTERSON Natalia | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 56 | MALICK Farshiya | 10% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | XU Audrey J. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.