San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
2 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
3 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
3 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
5 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
7 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
8 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% | |
9 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
10 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 15% | |
11 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
12 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
13 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% |
14 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
15 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
16 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
17 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | 2% | |
18 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
19 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 23% |
20 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
21 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 12% | |
22 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 11% | |
23 | OHALLORAN Zoe | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% | |
24 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 99% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
25 | SHEKAR ANUVA | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
26 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
27 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
28 | GONG Chloe | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | LEE Bethanie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
30 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
31 | TOM Caitlyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 4% | |
32 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
33 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 91% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | |
34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
35 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 4% | |
36 | BARRON Isabella | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | |
37 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 93% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | |
37 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 42% | 9% | - | |
39 | GREEN Perri L. | 100% | 88% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | |
40 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
41 | THOMAS Saejel | 100% | 91% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
42 | VINOD Amaya N. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
43 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
44 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
45 | LIU Jessica | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
46 | HO Kristen | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
48 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
49 | PENG Serena | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
50 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 90% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
51 | SALAMATI Soraya A. | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | |
51 | BACCARI Isabella M. | 100% | 74% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
53 | ZHOU Aria | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
53 | MU Allison | 100% | 85% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
55 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
56 | MALICK Farshiya | 100% | 90% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
57 | XU Audrey J. | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.