Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIBERI Joseph (Joe) H. | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% | |
| 2 | GARLINGTON David | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 53% | 17% |
| 3 | LEE Seungwon | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 3 | CLAYMAN John A. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Joshua (Josh) D. | - | - | - | 9% | 43% | 48% | |
| 6 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
| 7 | CHAN Andrew M. | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 2% | |
| 8 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 9 | SHUGART Henry R. | - | 7% | 34% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 10 | DRYJA David | - | 2% | 22% | 45% | 28% | 2% | |
| 11 | ALLEN Brendan E. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 12 | JOHANSON David B. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 13 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | - | 4% | 42% | 46% | 8% | |
| 14 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 15 | GROGAN Hunter K. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 17 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | ANDERSON Henry | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 19 | BRETT Joseph | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 19 | ANDERSON Haakon | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 21 | ANDERSON Alan J. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 22 | LUTTON Patricia | 1% | 30% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | WALSH Kevin | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | SOLTER Kai | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | REES Daniel I. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | MAO Rebecca J. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | CRAVEY Donald (Don) N. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | BARON Sabina | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 30 | GOLDMAN Rami | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | GIRARD Emma | 3% | 33% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | BRETT Mary | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | JASSEM Mikayla E. | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | KAJI Ty | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 35 | DAVIS Greg | 28% | 47% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | COLLINS markus | 22% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | SCHIFFMAYER Ginger | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 38 | NIETZER Jo A. | 3% | 34% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | DAVIS Emma | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 40 | CHUFONG-SPRAGUE Matthew | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SCHELL Julia | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | WAKE Karen J. | 5% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.