Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TIBERI Joseph (Joe) H. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
2 | GARLINGTON David | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | LEE Seungwon | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
3 | CLAYMAN John A. | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
5 | WILLIAMS Joshua (Josh) D. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
6 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
7 | CHAN Andrew M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
8 | DARRICAU Henri J. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
9 | SHUGART Henry R. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
10 | DRYJA David | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
11 | ALLEN Brendan E. | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
12 | JOHANSON David B. | D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
13 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
14 | BLYTH Jourdain L. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | GROGAN Hunter K. | D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
16 | BUVARP Elisabeth M. | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
17 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | V V V V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
18 | ANDERSON Henry | V D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
19 | BRETT Joseph | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
19 | ANDERSON Haakon | V V D V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
21 | ANDERSON Alan J. | V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
22 | LUTTON Patricia | V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
23 | WALSH Kevin | D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
24 | SOLTER Kai | D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
25 | REES Daniel I. | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
26 | MAO Rebecca J. | D D V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
27 | CRAVEY Donald (Don) N. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
28 | BARON Sabina | D D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
29 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
30 | GOLDMAN Rami | D D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
31 | GIRARD Emma | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
32 | BRETT Mary | D D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
33 | JASSEM Mikayla E. | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
34 | KAJI Ty | V V D D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
35 | DAVIS Greg | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
35 | COLLINS markus | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
37 | SCHIFFMAYER Ginger | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
38 | NIETZER Jo A. | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
38 | DAVIS Emma | V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
40 | TIBBETTS Johnathan | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
40 | CHUFONG-SPRAGUE Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
42 | SCHELL Julia | D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
43 | WAKE Karen J. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.