Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ARIZA Isaac A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
| 2 | TOMINO rafael | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 45% | 10% | |
| 3 | SAGE Michael J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 50% | 11% |
| 3 | DEGROOT Blake | - | - | 3% | 21% | 51% | 22% | 2% |
| 5 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 36% | |
| 7 | DERBAUM Brandon A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
| 8 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 48% | 9% |
| 9 | SYLVESTER William Z. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 10 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 11 | DERBAUM Ryan | - | - | 1% | 14% | 49% | 36% | |
| 12 | VIANNA Guilherme | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 13 | DONDERIS AJ | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | |
| 14 | ZHENG zhe | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 15 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | - | 6% | 35% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 16 | LOVE Aaron | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 17 | JITTAN daniel | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% | |
| 18 | LEE Jacob | 1% | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | FORSYTH Patrick | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | ANAND Aayush | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | ROSS III Paul D. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LONG Connor M. | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 2% | |
| 23 | CEDERQUIST Zachary | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 24 | KIM Justin | 24% | 53% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | TUGGY Sam | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WEGMAN Jack | 12% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 28 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 4% | 37% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | KIM Chaemin | 22% | 45% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BATRA Dev | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | HOGGARD Carson | 31% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | RIVERA IVAN | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 33 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 1% | 12% | 43% | 36% | 8% | - | |
| 34 | KHAN Ahyaan | 21% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 35 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 53% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | ECKES Tyler | 7% | 42% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | YUAN Austin | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | CUNANAN Ethan | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.