Orlando, FL - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ARIZA Isaac A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 2 | TOMINO rafael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 10% | |
| 3 | SAGE Michael J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 11% |
| 3 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 24% | 2% |
| 5 | GRIFFITH JACK | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% |
| 6 | SONG Leonardo T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% | |
| 7 | DERBAUM Brandon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 8 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 9% |
| 9 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 10 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 11 | DERBAUM Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 36% | |
| 12 | VIANNA Guilherme | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 13 | DONDERIS AJ | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 14 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | ORTEGA Jose-Arnel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | 14% | 1% | |
| 16 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 17 | JITTAN daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | |
| 18 | LEE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | FORSYTH Patrick | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | ANAND Aayush | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | ROSS III Paul D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | LONG Connor M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
| 23 | CEDERQUIST Zachary | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 24 | KIM Justin | 100% | 76% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | TUGGY Sam | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WEGMAN Jack | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | BUCHENHORST Anton | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 28 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 96% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | KIM Chaemin | 100% | 78% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | BATRA Dev | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | HOGGARD Carson | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | RIVERA IVAN | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 33 | FRIEDENBERGER Jacob | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 8% | - | |
| 34 | KHAN Ahyaan | 100% | 79% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 35 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 100% | 47% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | ECKES Tyler | 100% | 93% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | YUAN Austin | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | CUNANAN Ethan | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.