Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHOMAN Jenna | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | POSSICK Lola P. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | CHIOLDI Mina | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
5 | PAK Kaitlyn | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
6 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
8 | LU Amy | D D V V V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
9 | TAO Hannah J. | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
10 | LEE Alexandra B. | D V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
11 | SHIH Christina | D V V V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
12 | OLSEN Natalie J. | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
13 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | NEWELL Alexia C. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | KALRA Himani V. | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
16 | MIKA Veronica | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
17 | ALCEBAR Kayla | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
18 | NEIBART Fiona | V V V D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
19 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | V V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | YANG Ashley M. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
21 | BUHAY Rachel T. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | CHEN Xinyan | V D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
23 | RIZKALA Joanna | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | JULIEN Michelle | D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
25 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V D D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
26 | SHOMAN Miriam | V D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | STONE Hava S. | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
28 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | D V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
29 | WU Erica L. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
30 | BAKER Audrey C. | V D D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
31 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
32 | HILD Nisha | V D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
33 | LI Amanda C. | V V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
34 | TONG Kunling | V D D D V V | D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
35 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | V D V V D D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
36 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | V V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
37 | TODD Phoebe | V D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
38 | SINHA Anika | D D V V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
39 | JIN Olivia P. | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
39 | WEI Vivian W. | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
41 | CHIANG Emily | V D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
42 | LIN Selena | D D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
43 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | D D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | SOURIMTO Valeria | D V D D D V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
45 | NG Sarah W. | V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
46 | KIM Marley I. | D D D D V D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
47 | BILILIES Sophia | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
48 | BAKER Amelia M. | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
49 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
50 | JAVERI Amaya | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
51 | JENKINS Scotland | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
52 | HE Lizbeth | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
53 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
53 | GRAFF Sophie | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
55 | HUANG Lily | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.