Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 3 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 3 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 5 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 6 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 7 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
| 8 | LU Amy | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 9 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 10 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 40% | 39% |
| 11 | SHIH Christina | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 12 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% |
| 13 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
| 15 | KALRA Himani V. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 16 | MIKA Veronica | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | NEIBART Fiona | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 19 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 21 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 22 | CHEN Xinyan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | JULIEN Michelle | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 25 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | SHOMAN Miriam | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | STONE Hava S. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 28 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WU Erica L. | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 30 | BAKER Audrey C. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 34 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 35 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | TODD Phoebe | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 39 | JIN Olivia P. | - | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | WEI Vivian W. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHIANG Emily | 4% | 18% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 42 | LIN Selena | 9% | 42% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | NYSTROM Sofia C. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 44 | SOURIMTO Valeria | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | NG Sarah W. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | KIM Marley I. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 47 | BILILIES Sophia | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Amelia M. | 31% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | GUTHIKONDA Sunanya | 17% | 40% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | JAVERI Amaya | 25% | 46% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | JENKINS Scotland | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | HE Lizbeth | 13% | 32% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | D'ORAZIO Sofia V. | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | GRAFF Sophie | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | HUANG Lily | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.