Baltimore, MD - Baltimore, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 2 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 3 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
| 5 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | |
| 6 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 7 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | |
| 8 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | |
| 10 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 11 | LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 12 | BECCHINA Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 13 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 14 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 15 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | |
| 16 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 17 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 28% | |
| 20 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
| 22 | RICHARDSON Lauren C. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 24 | YU Bailey | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 25 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 26 | OGAWA Kaylin | 100% | 98% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | WAN Runxi | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 35 | CASPAR Margot | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | CHEN yue | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.