East Point, GA - East Point, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | FAYEZ Sherif | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 2 | SHIN Sung (Andy) | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | MUNLIN Donovan | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 5 | KIM Ethan J. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 6 | TEITENBERG John F. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | JUNG Ho(Daniel) (Daniel) Y. | V D V D V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 8 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | V D D V D | V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 9 | CAI Brian | V V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | CAPELLUA Tommaso | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | XU Alex | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 12 | ANDERSON Mathew T. | V V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 13 | KIM Alexander | D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | PARK Jong-Eun | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | SIVAGAR Leo | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 16 | TINSLEY Cole | D V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | JAMES Samuel | V V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 18 | KIM Ray | V V D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 19 | MOON Ryan Y. | V D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | DILLE Brice | V D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 21 | DOELEMAN zeno | V D V V D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 22 | SALISBURY Cary | V D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 23 | HAN David | V V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | JUNG Minche | V D V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | LIU Edward | V D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 26 | JOSEPH William | D D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | JAAFAR Omar | D V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | SONG Ervin | D V V D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 29 | PARNAS Ely | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | LABROZZI Aidan | D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 30 | LEE Kennith | D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | WALKER IV Weymouth D. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 33 | SAYLOR David A. | D V D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 34 | O’DEA Anthony | D V D D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 35 | O'CONNOR Riley | V V D D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 36 | DILLE Jackson K. | D D V V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 37 | VAUGHN David | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 38 | SHAH Anuj | V D V D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | D V D D V D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 40 | PAK Matthew | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 41 | YI Daniel | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 42 | STEVENS Daniel | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 43 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 44 | MISKELL William | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 45 | PARNAS Apollo | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 46 | CRANE Matthew T. | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 47 | MERMIGKAS John | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | PARAMESH Dhilan R. | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 49 | MA Bochen | D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 50 | WANG Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 51 | CHOU Ryan | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.