Charlotte, NC - Charlotte, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LINDER James (Luke) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 2 | WALKER Christopher J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 3 | BIVINS III George A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
| 5 | REN Junming | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 6 | SKEETE Kamar A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 7 | SMITH Jared C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 8 | KIM Stephen E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 9 | KIM Brian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | HARLEY Colby A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 11 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | PARK Donghwan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
| 13 | KARAM Tariq A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 14 | DINU Nicholas D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 15 | ATTIG Will T. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% | |
| 16 | LIMB Matthew G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 17 | KULDELL Spencer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 18 | LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 66% | 26% |
| 19 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 20 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 21 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 22 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 24 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 24 | LEUNG Mark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 26 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 27 | LIU kelly | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 29 | MA Jonathan D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 30 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 32 | TE VELDE Noah C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 33 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 34 | KIM Charlson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% | |
| 35 | BOLTON Braydon A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 36 | TONG Qilin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 38 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 39 | JI Cody Walter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 40 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 41 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | |
| 42 | D'ORAZIO Joseph | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 43 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 44 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 45 | MENG Bolang B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 46 | MERCHANT Marcel J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 47 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
| 48 | LIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
| 48 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 50 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 4% |
| 51 | ZHOU Matthew R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 52 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 52 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Akhil | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | KIM Sean G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 55 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | QIU Le | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 57 | SMITH David C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | MOON Sean H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
| 59 | HU William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 60 | LIANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 61 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 24% |
| 62 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 63 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 64 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 65 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 66 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 67 | KOKOSINSKI Eryk | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 68 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 69 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | |
| 70 | KUPANOFF Dimitri N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 71 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
| 72 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 73 | RICE Vaughn A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
| 74 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 75 | LIN John A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 76 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 77 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 78 | MULVANEY Alec S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 79 | YANG Ziyi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 80 | DAMMER Mark W. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 81 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | RAMAN Easwer | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 83 | LAI Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 83 | YANG Kevin S. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 85 | ZHANG Michael M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 86 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | SOHN Kevin J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 1% |
| 88 | CHENIER Marc-Olivier | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 89 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 90 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 91 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 92 | MURZYN III CJ | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 93 | ESCUETA Tony V. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 94 | KANARY Logan A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
| 95 | SINGER Carson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 96 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 97 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 98 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 99 | ALTIRS Alexander | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 100 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 101 | JULIEN William A | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
| 102 | POPE Nico | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 103 | DANNULL Linus N. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 103 | SAKHAMURI Surya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 105 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 105 | DEMAREST Iain | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 107 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 107 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 109 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 110 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 111 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 112 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 113 | STEINMETZ John | 100% | 66% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 114 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 115 | KOVACS Christian | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 115 | HAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 117 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
| 118 | TANG Alex Y. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | |
| 119 | LORTKIPANIDZE Guram | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 120 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 121 | IWAMOTO Eric Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 122 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 124 | PARKHURST Jr Michael | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 125 | YUAN Ronald I. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 126 | HARRIS Alex K. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 127 | GEFELL Andrew P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 128 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% | |
| 129 | WUN William | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 130 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 1% |
| 131 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 132 | SEVOSTYANOV Stepan (Seva) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 133 | PEDERSEN Leif | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 134 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 135 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 136 | DODRILL Grant | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 137 | YOUNG Nash | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 138 | SHIN Richard J.H. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 139 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 140 | KOUNALAKIS Antoneo T. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 141 | MENSAH Kennedy C | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 142 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 143 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 144 | CHU Cameron | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 145 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 146 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 147 | MARSEE James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 148 | HAMMER Peter A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 149 | LI Joshua L. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 150 | OWENS William | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 151 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 151 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 153 | CHU Devin | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 154 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 155 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 156 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 157 | NOBLE Daniel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 157 | XU Ryan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 159 | HOUTZ Jackson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 160 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 160 | JACOB Bret | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 162 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 163 | GRASS James D. | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 164 | NIL Michael Y. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 165 | CHANG Eliot A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 166 | RESHEIDAT Malik | 100% | 94% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 167 | LUO ZIRUI | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 168 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 169 | LIN William | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 170 | BAILEY Asher | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 171 | DESAI Drewv D. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 172 | RICH Jack | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 173 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 174 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 175 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 176 | BELSER Bryce S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 177 | FLORES Peter D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 178 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 179 | DROZ Camden J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 180 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 180 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 180 | NGUYEN Andrew | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 183 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 184 | TRACY Jahi | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 185 | MORREALE John | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 186 | HONG Steven | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 187 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 188 | HARLEY Sage N. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 189 | BOLTON Dawson E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 190 | LIU Jesse Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 190 | XU Michael | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 192 | HURST Alexander | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 192 | LAURIN Charles-Antoine | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 194 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 195 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 196 | RAI Avin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 197 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 198 | MOLINARO Lawrence | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 199 | SMITLEY Tyler J. | 100% | 90% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 200 | KOKKIN Jack S. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 201 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 202 | MARGIL Matthew | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 202 | STONE Christopher A. | 100% | 55% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 204 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 204 | JIANG Kevin | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 204 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 207 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 60% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 208 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 209 | FORT David | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 209 | YANG Ethan | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 209 | RENGER Felipe | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.