Nazlymov Fencing - Washington, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 48% | 26% | |
2 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | 2% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% | |
4 | JIANG Kevin | - | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
5 | LEONARD Cole | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
6 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
7 | LEE Kyle | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
8 | LEE Justin | - | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
9 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | - | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
10 | TANG Annie L. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - | |
11 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 19% | 3% | |
12 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 13% | 48% | 31% | 7% | - | - | - | |
13 | FENG Leo | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | HECK Steven D. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
15 | PAN Andrew W. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
16 | JOHNSON Lauren | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
17 | HU Allison C. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
18 | YEE Evan J. | 1% | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - | |
19 | NAZAROV Adilzhan | 33% | 49% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
20 | KOROLEVA Elizaveta | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
21 | YEE Eldon | 11% | 50% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
22 | COHEN Charlotte | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.