Nazlymov Fencing - Washington, DC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 26% | |
| 2 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 25% | |
| 4 | JIANG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 7 | LEE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 8 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 10 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 22% | 3% | |
| 12 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 100% | 87% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 13 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 14 | HECK Steven D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
| 15 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 16 | JOHNSON Lauren | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | HU Allison C. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | YEE Evan J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | NAZAROV Adilzhan | 100% | 67% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 20 | KOROLEVA Elizaveta | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | YEE Eldon | 100% | 89% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 22 | COHEN Charlotte | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.