Boston Fencing Club ROC

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, February 1, 2020 at 8:00 AM

Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Niles J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 69%
2 ADAMS Luke C. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
3 JIMENEZ Diran 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 17%
3 COSTELLO Chaissen F. 100% 100% 98% 80% 35% 4%
5 SULLIVAN Jackson R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 49%
6 HEWES Thomas G. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
7 KAO Castor T. 100% 100% 99% 82% 38% 5%
8 LIU Kevin B. 100% 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 3%
9 IVARSSON Oliver 100% 100% 93% 66% 27% 6% -
10 DING Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
11 CHENG Thomas C. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 16%
12 MARSHALL Ian 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 26% 4%
13 DOBBINS Evan W. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 21%
14 SHA Yi Peng 100% 99% 91% 50% 12% 1%
15 LI Owen 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
16 BING Charles 100% 100% 96% 76% 37% 8%
17 SANTULLI Tristan 100% 92% 62% 23% 4% -
18 HERGERT Benito 100% 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 3%
19 DEGREMONT Henri S. 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 29% 5%
20 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 25%
21 ZHAO Jesse 100% 71% 28% 5% - -
22 ALIMI Yacine A. 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
23 CUTLER Andrew 100% 87% 44% 12% 2% - -
24 BAO Chris W. 100% 52% 8% - - -
25 PAN Eric 100% 99% 88% 53% 18% 3% -
26 LIGH Thomas 100% 93% 55% 18% 3% - -
27 GUO Hairuo 100% 60% 18% 3% - - -
28 CORTIZAS John (Jack) 100% 99% 93% 69% 32% 7% 1%
29 QI Steve 100% 91% 57% 21% 4% - -
30 JIN Dennis H. 100% 68% 14% 1% - -
31 ACHILOV Sayid 100% 88% 51% 16% 2% -
32 BOUSSY Luciano 100% 34% 5% - - - -
33 ZHANG Zixuan "Mark" 100% 50% 10% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.