Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MOLHO Sofia | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 2 | ZHENG Ivy | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | BREKER Anika | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | V V V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 5 | JING Emily | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | WANG Ellen | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | V V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 8 | HE Fenghuan | D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | DAVIA Daniella V. | V D V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 11 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | XU Madison | V D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 13 | SHANG Andrea | D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 13 | LEVI Lea | D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 15 | LI Meilin | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | D V D V D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | DU Hannah | V V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | WU Irene M. | V V V D D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | XIANG Emma | D V V D V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 20 | CARTER Jane (Jane P (Hall) Carter) P. | V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 21 | WU Julianna Y. | V D V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 22 | HUANG NATALIE | D D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | SARTORI Taylor M. | D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 24 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | V D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | XUE Alanna | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 27 | SU Michelle | D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | MUSTO Isabella | D V D D V | V D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 29 | LI Rachel Y. | D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 30 | FU Qihan | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | GU Emily | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 32 | YU Jaime L. | D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | D V D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 34 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 35 | BASSON Bayley D. | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 36 | KERR Margaret E. | V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 38 | SHAW Guinevere L. | D D D V D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 39 | GARDINER Sophia A. | V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 40 | BAO Andria | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 41 | JENKINS Hannah G. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 42 | OLSEN Jen | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 43 | MAO SHIYI | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.