Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOLHO Sofia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 32% | |
| 2 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% | |
| 3 | BREKER Anika | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% | |
| 5 | JING Emily | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 6 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 29% | |
| 7 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 8 | HE Fenghuan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 41% | |
| 9 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
| 10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 3% | |
| 11 | YUGOV Elizabeth (Liz Yugov) | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 12 | XU Madison | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | SHANG Andrea | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | LEVI Lea | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 24% | |
| 15 | LI Meilin | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 16 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | DU Hannah | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | WU Irene M. | - | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | XIANG Emma | 6% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | CARTER Jane (Jane P (Hall) Carter) P. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 50% | 26% | |
| 21 | WU Julianna Y. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 24 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 26 | XUE Alanna | 2% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | SU Michelle | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | MUSTO Isabella | 43% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | LI Rachel Y. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 30 | FU Qihan | 7% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | GU Emily | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | YU Jaime L. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | DEVEREAUX Kate E. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | BASSON Bayley D. | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | KERR Margaret E. | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% | |
| 36 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | SHAW Guinevere L. | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | GARDINER Sophia A. | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 40 | BAO Andria | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | JENKINS Hannah G. | 17% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | OLSEN Jen | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | MAO SHIYI | 27% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.