Troy, MI - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 57% |
2 | YANG Luao | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
3 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | - |
3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
5 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | - |
6 | RUSSELL Paul | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 56% |
7 | SENIC Lucas | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
8 | ANTONUCCI Suren | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | GUTH Joseph | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
10 | HAN Derek | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | - |
11 | EDWARDS Maxon | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
12 | FINDLAY Zachary | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
13 | HEYBOER Jason | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
14 | KNIBBE Nathan | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
14 | MASSIE Otto | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
16 | CASCADE Paul | 5% | 30% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
17 | SZIRAKI Jordan | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
18 | MAVANI Krishna | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
19 | STRINGER David | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | - |
20 | MCGRATH Oliver | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
21 | LINCOLN William | 3% | 38% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.