Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LO Alexander | D V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | ELIN Adam E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 3 | PIWOWAR Alex | D D V V V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 5 | HAN Daniel Y. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | WEHLE Paul | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | CZAHA Balint | V V V D V D | V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 8 | DOLAN Charles R. | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 10 | MORALES Jonathan | V D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 11 | HOLZ William A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | SAVOY Luca | V V D V D V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 13 | ATEFI Daniel | D D V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 14 | KASPER Aaron | V V V V D D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 15 | PEDERSEN Leif | V V V D D V | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
| 16 | PENG Bryan | V D V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | BROOK Joel | V D D V V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 18 | MICHNA Colin P. | D V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 19 | ROSADO Mateo | V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 20 | LEUNG Nathan | V D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 21 | SHAO Peter | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 22 | LI Yao (Liam) | V D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 22 | PERRON Robert | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 24 | LENZ Max | D V V D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 25 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 26 | BRIDGES Benjamin | D D D V D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | BONDARENCO Vlad | D V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | KAPOOR Tanmay | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 29 | BRIGGS Gavin | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 30 | MAGNI Jesse | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | FITZPATRICK Evan | D D V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 32 | BURFEIND Samuel | V D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | RINDISBACHER Peter | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 34 | ADAMS Rhys | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.