Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
2 | ALIMI Yacine A. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
3 | DU Samuel R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | |
3 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
5 | SHA Yi Peng | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 52% |
6 | LI Eric | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
7 | ACHILOV Sayid | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
8 | PAN Eric | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
9 | BING Charles | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
10 | LI Owen | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
11 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 43% | 7% |
12 | ZHEN Ethan | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
13 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
14 | PITERBARG Maxim | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
15 | WANG Mason | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
16 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | TSAI Max W. | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
18 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
19 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 44% | 14% |
20 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
21 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
22 | SONG Bryan | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
23 | LIN James G. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
24 | LEE Jonah | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
25 | GARCIA Sebastian R. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
26 | PO Oliver | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
27 | LI Arvin | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
28 | WU Michael | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
29 | LI Ayren | 1% | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
29 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
31 | PLASTARAS Trey | 2% | 18% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | GU Andrew | - | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
33 | QI Steve | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 8% | - |
34 | TORRES Treston | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
35 | XU Ethan | 5% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | SUTARIA Julian | 21% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
37 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | LI Aaron | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | DENG Kenny | 9% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
40 | SHAO Eric | 14% | 46% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | EBERMAN Henry | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
42 | LIU Charles | 57% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
43 | RNO Kyler | 11% | 45% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | LIU Jeremiah | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
45 | REN Bingye | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
46 | BISHOP Henry | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
47 | FANG Wilson | 9% | 52% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.