The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 2 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 38% | 8% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 41% | 49% |
| 3 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 50% | 21% |
| 5 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | - | - | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 6 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 7 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 8 | HO Addison | 1% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | CALISE Ella | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 10 | SUN Chloe | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 12 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 14 | FUNG Vera | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
| 15 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 16 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 17 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 18 | KIM Rachel | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 19 | HOBSON Ava | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 20 | YANG Audrey | 3% | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | PENG Serena | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 14% | 1% |
| 22 | KO Claire | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 44% | 12% |
| 24 | ZHONG Aleena | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PENG Charlotte | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | OH Ceana | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | YAN Noelle | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% | |
| 28 | NAIR Supriya | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
| 29 | LEE Allison | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
| 30 | ZHENG Zoe | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | DAVIS Logan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 32 | HSU Kaylin | - | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 33 | MU Allison | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 11% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DESAI Esha | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SWANSON Alexa | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | SEAL Cameron I. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 38 | WANG Celine S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | COX Sophia | 6% | 44% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | REN Kayley | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 43 | KIM Chloe | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 44 | BEAVER Ava | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 45 | YUEN Elsie | 15% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | CUI Alivia | 9% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | EBERHART Ava | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Ivy | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ATHANASIOU Mabel | 4% | 33% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 51 | SAIFEE Lamya | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | DHARWADKAR Ovee | 13% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SEAL Ayda | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIN Phoebe | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | MONAT Jennifer | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | GOEL Riyana | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | RUAN Lana | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.