The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | |
| 2 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 45% | 8% |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 49% |
| 3 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 21% |
| 5 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% |
| 6 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% | |
| 7 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 8 | HO Addison | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 10 | SUN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 12 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 13 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 14 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% | |
| 15 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 16 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 17 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 18 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
| 19 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 20 | YANG Audrey | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 21 | PENG Serena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | 1% |
| 22 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 12% |
| 24 | ZHONG Aleena | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | OH Ceana | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | NAIR Supriya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
| 29 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
| 30 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | DAVIS Logan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 32 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 33 | MU Allison | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 34 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 89% | 52% | 15% | 1% | - |
| 35 | DESAI Esha | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | SEAL Cameron I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 38 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 39 | DANIELYANTS Gabriela | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | COX Sophia | 100% | 94% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | REN Kayley | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 42 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | KIM Chloe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 44 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 45 | YUEN Elsie | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | CUI Alivia | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | EBERHART Ava | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Ivy | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ATHANASIOU Mabel | 100% | 96% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | KANDL-ZHANG Lea | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | DHARWADKAR Ovee | 100% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SEAL Ayda | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | LIN Phoebe | 100% | 88% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | MONAT Jennifer | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | RUAN Lana | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.