New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
2 | SEMEL Liana M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
3 | MILLER Naomi E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
5 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
6 | WU Irene M. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
7 | YE Eileen | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
8 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | V D D V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
9 | YU Lauren C. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
11 | WEBB Ella | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
12 | ZHANG Alina C. | D V D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
13 | XUE Alanna L. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
14 | LI Rachel Y. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
15 | CHOW Annabelle | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
16 | DU Hannah | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
17 | ROY Layla | V V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
18 | FU Qihan | V V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
19 | SU Michelle | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
20 | WANG Jasmine | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
21 | HSIEH Rebecca | V V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
22 | HUANG Natalie | V D D D V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
23 | MEYER Claudia | D V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
24 | MI Aileen | D V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
25 | XIANG Emma | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
26 | MI Anning | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
27 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
28 | WU Julianna Y. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
29 | MEI Sarah | D D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
30 | GU Emily | V V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
31 | JIANG Claire | D D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
32 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | SEO Irene Y. | V D D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
34 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | V D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
35 | SHA Yi Ling | V D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
36 | SCHMIDT Victoria | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
37 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
38 | YU Jaime L. | D D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
39 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
40 | ROHRING Anna | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
41 | ZHENG Ying | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
42 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
---|---|---|
Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.