New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 2 | SEMEL Liana M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | MILLER Naomi E. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 5 | ACHILOVA Feyza | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 6 | WU Irene M. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | YE Eileen | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | V D D V V D | V V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 9 | YU Lauren C. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 10 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 11 | WEBB Ella | D D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | ZHANG Alina C. | D V D V V V | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 13 | XUE Alanna L. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | LI Rachel Y. | V V D V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 15 | CHOW Annabelle | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 16 | DU Hannah | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 17 | ROY Layla | V V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | FU Qihan | V V V D V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | SU Michelle | D V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 20 | WANG Jasmine | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | HSIEH Rebecca | V V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | HUANG Natalie | V D D D V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 23 | MEYER Claudia | D V D D V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 24 | MI Aileen | D V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 25 | XIANG Emma | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | MI Anning | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | D D D V V D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 28 | WU Julianna Y. | D V D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 29 | MEI Sarah | D D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 30 | GU Emily | V V D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 31 | JIANG Claire | D D D D V D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | SEO Irene Y. | V D D V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 34 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | V D V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 35 | SHA Yi Ling | V D D D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 36 | SCHMIDT Victoria | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 37 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | YU Jaime L. | D D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 39 | LENZ Zoe N. | D D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | ROHRING Anna | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 41 | ZHENG Ying | D D D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 42 | WININGER-SIEVE Taylor | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.