New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LONADIER Keira | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
2 | SMUK Daria A. | - | - | 1% | 25% | 49% | 25% | |
3 | SAAL Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | |
3 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
5 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
6 | GUJJA Misha | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 2% |
7 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
8 | PALANSKI Cate | - | - | 3% | 33% | 47% | 18% | |
9 | SONG Angela | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
10 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
11 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
12 | FONG Vanessa | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
13 | SHU Youshan | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
14 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 1% | 22% | 48% | 28% | |
15 | MASTRONARDI Laura | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
16 | PAN Michelle | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
17 | SPRINGER Sierra | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
18 | PARSONS Leada | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 13% |
19 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | LI Fei | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
21 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
22 | SHEIN Evita | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | HANIN Katherine | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
24 | BYRON Karen J. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
25 | BALSKUS Sophia | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
26 | GELMAN Emily | 5% | 43% | 48% | 5% | - | - | |
27 | PRIHODKO Nina | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
28 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
29 | PAYNE Elizabeth | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
30 | MCGEE Sophia | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
31 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | UNGURIANU Nika | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
33 | BYK Laura | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
34 | ZHENG Linden | - | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
35 | ETZEL Rowan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
36 | RAMANATHAN Eesha | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
37 | TOP Melek | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
38 | LI Alisha | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
39 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
40 | JENSEN MJ | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
40 | SIU Maple | 10% | 48% | 38% | 4% | - | - | |
42 | SOMOL Emma | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | YANG Tiffany | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
44 | WEED Riley | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
45 | ALHUSSAINI Zainab | 70% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
46 | SCHWARTZ Greta | 5% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
47 | SIU Hazel | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.