New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LONADIER Keira | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
2 | SMUK Daria A. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | SAAL Anna | V D D V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
3 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | HAFEEZ Hiba | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
6 | GUJJA Misha | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
7 | HAFEEZ Hania | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
8 | PALANSKI Cate | V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
9 | SONG Angela | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
10 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
11 | LIN Elaine | V V V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
12 | FONG Vanessa | V D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | SHU Youshan | V V V V D V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
14 | YU Nicole J. | D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
15 | MASTRONARDI Laura | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
16 | PAN Michelle | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
17 | SPRINGER Sierra | V D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
18 | PARSONS Leada | V V D V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
19 | KANEVSKY Samantha | V D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
20 | LI Fei | D V V V D | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
21 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D D V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 3 | -2.1 |
22 | SHEIN Evita | V D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
23 | HANIN Katherine | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
24 | BYRON Karen J. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
25 | BALSKUS Sophia | V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
26 | GELMAN Emily | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
27 | PRIHODKO Nina | D D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
28 | BAJAJ Nikita K. | D D V V D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
29 | PAYNE Elizabeth | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
30 | MCGEE Sophia | D V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
31 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | D D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
32 | UNGURIANU Nika | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | BYK Laura | D D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
34 | ZHENG Linden | V D D D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
35 | ETZEL Rowan | D D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
36 | RAMANATHAN Eesha | V D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
37 | TOP Melek | D V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
38 | LI Alisha | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
39 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
40 | JENSEN MJ | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
40 | SIU Maple | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
42 | SOMOL Emma | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
43 | YANG Tiffany | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
44 | WEED Riley | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
45 | ALHUSSAINI Zainab | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
46 | SCHWARTZ Greta | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
47 | SIU Hazel | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.