Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
2 | JOYCE Michaela | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
3 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | CEBULA Anne | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
7 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
8 | YAMANAKA Mina | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
9 | CHIN Isabella | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
10 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
11 | KETKAR Ketki | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
12 | MACHULSKY Leehi | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
13 | KETKAR Mallika | V V V V D | V V V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
14 | GU Sarah | V V D D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
15 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
16 | ROSS Naomi O. | D D V D V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
17 | WANG Karen | V V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
18 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
19 | TYLER Syd | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
20 | LIN Jessica Y. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
21 | GANDHI Sedna S. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
22 | GARINA Ania (Ganusia) | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
23 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
24 | WANG Elizabeth | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | GRADY Miriam A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | PARK Faith K. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
27 | TOBY Natalia R. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
28 | KHROL Jaclyn | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
29 | MANGANO Ariana J. | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
30 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | D D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
31 | HENRY Asha S. | V V D V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
32 | LEE Michelle J. | D D V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | PATURU Meghana | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | NI Emma | V V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
35 | CHAN Cheri K. | V V D V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
36 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | V V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
37 | KIM Zoe L. | V V V V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
38 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
39 | LEE Sumin | D V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
40 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
40 | MESCHIA Maggie | D V D V V V | V D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
42 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
43 | BEI Karen | V D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
44 | MCLANE Lauren | D V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
45 | ANGEN Katie R. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
46 | CONSTANTINO Lola | V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
47 | DANIEL Chloe L. | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
48 | FALLON Kyle R. | V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
48 | ZUHARS Renee A. | V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
50 | ISERT Sarah | V V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
51 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | D V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
52 | WATRALL Christina | V D D V D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
53 | MAO Amy | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
54 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | V V V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
55 | BATES Cassandra L. | D D V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
55 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | V V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
57 | CHU Audrey | V D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
58 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | D D V D V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
59 | CHENG Ava | V V D D D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
60 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
61 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | D V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
62 | MILEWSKI Nicole | D D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
63 | YEU Irene | V D D V D D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
64 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
65 | STEWART Tatijana I. | D D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
66 | VERMEULE Emily | D V V D V V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
67 | WANG Nora | V V V D V D | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
68 | LIN Katie Y. | D V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
69 | REID Anousheh | V D V V V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
70 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | V D V D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
71 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | D V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
72 | LIU Christina A. | D V D V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
73 | MEHROTRA Anya | D D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
74 | WU Amelia | D V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
75 | LEUNG Natalie | V V D D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
76 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | V D V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
77 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
78 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
78 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | D D V D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
80 | CHOI Eunice | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
81 | PAPADAKIS Lily | D V D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
82 | GABERKORN Nadia | V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
83 | COBERT Helen G. | D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
84 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
85 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | D D D D V V | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
86 | LUO Ashley | D D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
87 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | D D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
88 | DONDISCH Sophia | D D D V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
89 | WONG Alexandra R. | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
90 | WEBER Nora | D D V V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
91 | LAVERY Chloe K. | V D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
91 | MARTUS Cosima O. | D V D D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
93 | DESAI Meera P. | D V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
94 | PADHYE Tanishka | V V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
95 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | V D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
96 | BOYS Nishta B. | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
96 | FELAND Alexandra | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
98 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
98 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
100 | LEANG Andrea K. | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
101 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
102 | BOK Michelle | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
103 | JAMES Josephine | D D D V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
104 | MILLER Veronica | D D V D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
105 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | D D V D D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
106 | CHAN Elizabeth | D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
107 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | D D D D V | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
108 | MYLER AnneMarie | D D D V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
109 | RUEDA Rylie | V D D D D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
110 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | D D V D D D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 | |
111 | LURYE Sarah | D V D D D D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 | |
112 | HEDVAT Alexis S. | D D D D D V | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
113 | RUNIONS Emersyn | D D D D V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
114 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | D D D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
115 | JAKEL Sophia N. | V D D D D D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 | |
116 | SMUK Daria A. | V D D D D D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 | |
117 | MUELLER Emma M. | D D D D D V | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
118 | AHUJA Arianna | D D V D D D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 | |
119 | KIM Erika S. | V D D D D D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
120 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | D D D D D D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 | |
121 | ELSTON Sophia | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
122 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
123 | LONG Cindy | D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
124 | MING Cynthia | D D D D D D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 | |
125 | SAAL Anna | D D D D D D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.