Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% | |
| 2 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 3 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 3 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% | |
| 5 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% |
| 6 | CEBULA Anne | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 7 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
| 8 | YAMANAKA Mina | - | - | 4% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 8% |
| 9 | CHIN Isabella | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 11 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 12 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 13 | KETKAR Mallika | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | GU Sarah | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 16 | ROSS Naomi O. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 17 | WANG Karen | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 18 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 19 | TYLER Syd | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 20 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 21 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 22 | GARINA Ania (Ganusia) | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 23 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 24 | WANG Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 3% | |
| 25 | GRADY Miriam A. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 26 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
| 27 | TOBY Natalia R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 28 | KHROL Jaclyn | - | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 41% | 8% |
| 29 | MANGANO Ariana J. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 30 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 31 | HENRY Asha S. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | LEE Michelle J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | PATURU Meghana | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | NI Emma | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | CHAN Cheri K. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 37 | KIM Zoe L. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 39 | LEE Sumin | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 40 | MESCHIA Maggie | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 43 | BEI Karen | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | MCLANE Lauren | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 45 | ANGEN Katie R. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 46 | CONSTANTINO Lola | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 47 | DANIEL Chloe L. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 48 | FALLON Kyle R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 48 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | ISERT Sarah | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 52 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 53 | MAO Amy | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | BATES Cassandra L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 55 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | CHU Audrey | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 58 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 59 | CHENG Ava | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 60 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 61 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
| 62 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 63 | YEU Irene | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 64 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - | |
| 65 | STEWART Tatijana I. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 66 | VERMEULE Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 67 | WANG Nora | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 68 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 69 | REID Anousheh | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 71 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | LIU Christina A. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 73 | MEHROTRA Anya | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 74 | WU Amelia | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 75 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 76 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 77 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 78 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 1% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 2% | |
| 78 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 80 | CHOI Eunice | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 81 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 82 | GABERKORN Nadia | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 83 | COBERT Helen G. | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 84 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 86 | LUO Ashley | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 87 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | DONDISCH Sophia | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 89 | WONG Alexandra R. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | WEBER Nora | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 91 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 93 | DESAI Meera P. | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 94 | PADHYE Tanishka | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 95 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 96 | BOYS Nishta B. | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 96 | FELAND Alexandra | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 98 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 98 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 100 | LEANG Andrea K. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 101 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 102 | BOK Michelle | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 103 | JAMES Josephine | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | MILLER Veronica | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 105 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 106 | CHAN Elizabeth | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 107 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 108 | MYLER AnneMarie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 109 | RUEDA Rylie | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 110 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 111 | LURYE Sarah | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 112 | HEDVAT Alexis S. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 113 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 114 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 115 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 116 | SMUK Daria A. | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | MUELLER Emma M. | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 118 | AHUJA Arianna | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 119 | KIM Erika S. | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 120 | SCHMIDT Lori M. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 121 | ELSTON Sophia | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 122 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 123 | LONG Cindy | 16% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 124 | MING Cynthia | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 125 | SAAL Anna | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.