Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TIEU May L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
2 | WEINTRAUB Maia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
3 | RHODES Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
3 | TAFFEL sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
5 | DEVORE Delphine P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
6 | ZHENG Vivian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
7 | NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
8 | MINARIK Natalie M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
9 | HE Elizabeth W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | |
10 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 9% |
11 | CHENG Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
12 | TAN Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
13 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
14 | CAO Arianna L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
15 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
16 | KNIGHT Skylar | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
17 | BLOW Iman (Mani) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
18 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
19 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
20 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
21 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
22 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
23 | BINDER Sylvie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
24 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 12% |
25 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
26 | GONG Christina S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
27 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 3% |
28 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
29 | CHUSID Renata M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 17% | |
30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | GRIFFIN Emma G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
32 | LEE Alina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
33 | YAROSHENKO Karina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
34 | PARTRIDGE Morgan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
35 | FLANAGAN Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
36 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
37 | CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
38 | ZHANG Rachel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
39 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
40 | APELIAN Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
41 | NOVOSELTSEVA Elizabeth (Liza) M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
42 | KONG Chin-Yi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
43 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
45 | QIAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
46 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
47 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
48 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | - |
49 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
50 | JO Mia C. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
51 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | WANG Karina X. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
53 | CHO Sabrina N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
54 | MASSICK Laine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
55 | REN Olivia Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
56 | ADLER Polly Z. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
56 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
58 | BREKER Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
59 | LUONG Paige K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
60 | PARK Rowan M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 6% | |
61 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
62 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
63 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
64 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
65 | KLINE Melissa C. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
66 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
67 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
68 | KIM Rachael | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
69 | LEE Brianna J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
70 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | LI Grace Q. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
72 | CHOI Lenna K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
73 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | DING Abigail | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
75 | DEBACK Greta I. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
76 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
77 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
78 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
79 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
80 | HUNG Juliana K. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
81 | FREEDMAN Miranda W. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
82 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
83 | YEH Samantha | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
84 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
85 | OH Erin H. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
86 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
87 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
88 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
89 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
90 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
91 | SARTORI Taylor M. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
92 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
93 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
94 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
95 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
96 | PERLMAN Talia | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
97 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
98 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
99 | XU Christine | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
100 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
101 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
102 | KOKES Gabrielle | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
103 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
104 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
104 | HALL Velma | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
106 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
107 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
108 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
109 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
110 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
111 | LI Meilin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
112 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
113 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
114 | ATLURI Srija | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
115 | KONG Olivia | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
116 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
117 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
117 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
119 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
119 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
121 | MCDONALD Alexandra | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
122 | KASI Anisha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.