National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Div I Women's Saber

Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 1:45 PM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.6 6 +0.4
2 THOMPSON Kamali A. V V V D V V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
3 LINDER Kara E. D V D V D V V V V V V D 5.2 3 -2.2
3 NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. V V V V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
5 THEODORE Maria A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
6 GREENBAUM Atara R. D V V V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
7 MILLER Sky V D V V V D V V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
8 POSSICK Lola P. V V D V D D V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
9 JENKINS Ryan J. V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
10 SKARBONKIEWICZ Magda V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
11 SULLIVAN Siobhan R. V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
12 CHAN Casey V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
13 YUN Joy V V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
14 LI Amanda C. V V V V D V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
15 GOUHIN Chloe V D V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
16 PAK Kaitlyn D V D D V V V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
17 OISHI Megumi D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
18 CAO Stephanie X. V D V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
19 TIMOFEYEV Nicole D V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
20 WEINBERG Alexandra L. V V V V V D V D 3.6 5 +1.4
21 HARRILL Gillian N. V V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
22 SATHYANATH Kailing V D V V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
23 SHOMAN Jenna V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
24 ANGLADE Alexis C. D V V V D V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
25 STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. V V D V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
26 NEWELL Alexia C. V V D V D V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
27 ADYNSKI Gillian I. V V D D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
28 JULIEN Michelle D V V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
29 WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. V V V D V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
30 WITEK Sophie B. V V V D D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
31 BROWN Emma V D V V D D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
32 BOIS Adele D V V D D D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
33 TZOU Alexandra V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
34 LU Vivian Y. V V V D V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
35 AVAKIAN Mikaela V D V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
36 PARKER Abigale B. V V V V V D D 3.9 5 +1.1
37 DELSOIN Chelsea C. V V V V D V D 3.2 5 +1.8
38 GREENBAUM Ella K. D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
39 DOHERTY Maverick L. V D V D V V D 4.0 4 -
39 YONG Erika E. D V V V V D D 3.0 4 +1.0
41 KALRA Himani V. V D V V V D D 2.7 4 +1.3
42 BLUM Leah I. V V V D V D D 3.7 4 +0.3
43 TONG Kunling V D V V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
44 HARRISON Imogen N. D V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
45 CHANG Josephine S. D V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
46 CHIN Erika J. V V V D D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
47 FOUR-GARCIA Madison V D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
48 LEE Alexandra B. V D V V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
49 LIU Rachel V V D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
50 WHANG Rebecca D V V D D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
51 XI Shining D V D D V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
52 WU Erica L. V D V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
53 WILLIAMS Chloe C. V D V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
54 ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. D V D D V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
55 FREEDMAN Janna N. D D V D V D V D 3.5 2 -1.5
56 SHEALY Maggie V D V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
57 GHAYALOD reya D V V D D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
58 KER Grace D V D V D D V D 2.1 2 -0.1
59 HONE Katarina G. V D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
60 MIKA Veronica D V D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
61 KOVACS Sophia D V V D D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
62 SHOMAN Miriam V D V D D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
63 LEVITIS Danielle D D D D V V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
64 LIN Audrey J. V D D D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
65 SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. V V V V D D D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 MOZHAEVA MARIA V D V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
67 TANG Catherine H. D V V D V D 1.5 3 +1.5
68 HOOGENDOORN Sterre V D V V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
69 YUN Maya V V D D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
70 YAP Madeline V D D D V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
71 KATZ Anat V D D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
72 GORMLEY Arwen E. V V D V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
73 MATAIEV Natalie S. D D V V V D D 1.7 3 +1.3
74 BHATTACHARJEE Rhea D V D V V D D 1.9 3 +1.1
75 MARSEE Samantha D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
76 TUCKER Iman R. D D V V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
77 HOOGENDOORN Levi D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
78 TAO Hannah J. D V D D V D D 3.1 2 -1.1
79 LACSON Sarah D D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
80 HULSEBURG Kaitlyn D D D D V V D 3.0 2 -1.0
81 CHEN Xinyan D D V D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
81 CALLAHAN Chase J. D D D D V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
83 KOBOZEVA Tamara V. D D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
83 GUTHIKONDA Nithya D D D D V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
85 FEARNS Zara A. D V D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
86 SECK Chejsa-Kaili F. D D V D V D D 3.3 2 -1.3
87 BENTOLILA Thalia D V D V D D D 1.1 2 +0.9
88 ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. D D D V V D D 0.7 2 +1.3
89 CHIN Sophia J. V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
90 BALAKUMARAN Maya D V D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
91 LU Amy V V D D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
92 SZETO Chloe D V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
93 VADASZ Ibla P. V D V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
94 ANDRES Katherine A. D V D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
95 KIM Zoe D V D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
96 ENDO Miyuki N. D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 SHEARER Natalie E. D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 BENOIT Adelaide L. V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
99 ANDRES Charmaine G. D D D D D V 2.7 1 -1.7
100 BUHAY Rachel T. D D V D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
101 CHAN Audrey D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
102 CODY Alexandra C. D D V D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
103 VALADEZ Emily T. D D D D V D 2.2 1 -1.2
104 SATHE Mehek S. D D D D V D 1.1 1 -0.1
105 KONG Carys H. D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
106 SHIN Andrea Y. D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
107 OLSEN Natalie J. V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
108 STONE Hava S. D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
109 ATLURI Sara V. D D D D D V 2.0 1 -1.0
109 SLOBODSKY Sasha L. D V D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
111 WIGGERS Susan Q. D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
112 GORMAN Victoria M. D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
113 HURST Kennedy D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
114 STAPLETON Lindsay K. D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
114 NEIBART Fiona D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.