Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
2 | TE VELDE Noah C. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
3 | SMITH Jared C. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
3 | LAI Adam J. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
5 | FIELDS Malcolm D. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 44% | |
6 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
7 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
8 | BOOTH Zaheer | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
9 | LORTKIPANIDZE Nickoloz | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
10 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 31% | 34% | 15% |
11 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
12 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
13 | SIERADZKY Dawson | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
14 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
15 | LUKASHENKO Darii | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
16 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
17 | JOHNSON Zachary (Zack) C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
18 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
19 | KARAM Tariq A. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
20 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
20 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 4% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
22 | PARK Donghwan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
23 | LIANG Connor | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
24 | VOCHOSKA Aidan F. | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
25 | WALKER Dalton F. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 25% | |
26 | LILOV Neil | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
27 | MEHTA Sachin N. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
28 | HONG Marshall Q. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
29 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
30 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
31 | LE Hayden | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - |
32 | SMITH David C. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
33 | ARMIJO Gabriel K. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
34 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
35 | KULDELL Spencer D. | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
36 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
37 | YANG Ziyi | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
38 | SMITH Mitchell M. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
39 | GREENBAUM Maxwell H. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
40 | OSTER Keegan J. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
41 | HU William | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
42 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
43 | WIND Nicky E. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
44 | JINICH Ilan R. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
45 | LIN John A. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
46 | ATTIG Will T. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
47 | DODRILL Grant | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
48 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
49 | KIM Shawn J. | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
50 | KIM Sean G. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
51 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
52 | LO Joshua H. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
53 | JEAN Noe T. | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
54 | TANN Justin | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | SHI Andrew | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
56 | BOLTON Dawson E. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
57 | MORREALE John | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
58 | BARNETT Adam | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
59 | SOHN Kevin J. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
60 | SHEPANEK Noah M. | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
61 | DHINGRA Gian K. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
62 | RAI Avin | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
63 | QUAN Nicholas | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
64 | JI Cody Walter | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
65 | BARBER William S. | 12% | 39% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
66 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
67 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
68 | CZAHA Balint | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
69 | WILSON Jude | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
70 | MAHONEY Colin M. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
71 | ALTIRS Alexander | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | MERCHANT Marcel J. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
73 | MOON Sean H. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
74 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
75 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
75 | HAN Daniel Y. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | XU William | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
78 | DROZ Camden J. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
79 | MIKA Casper | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 8% |
80 | TONG ZACHARY | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
81 | YEN Darren | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
81 | LIU David J. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
83 | JEFFORDS Alexander | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
84 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
85 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
86 | ZU Kevin | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
87 | NADILE Henry V. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
88 | SIMAK Joseph P. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
89 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
90 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
91 | BOLTON Braydon A. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
92 | WOODWARD Connor | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
93 | ROBERTS Sam | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
94 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
94 | KIM Andrew H. | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
96 | MORRILL Justin | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
97 | JIANG Anthony | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
98 | SKINNER Graham B. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
99 | MORRILL William | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
100 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
101 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
102 | BERGER Oliver | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
103 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
104 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
105 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
106 | TONG Qilin | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
107 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
108 | RIGHTLER Samuel | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
109 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
110 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
111 | REESE Aaron S. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
111 | LIU kelly | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
113 | SO Hananiah | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
114 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
114 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
116 | FENG Leo | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
117 | NOBLE Daniel | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
117 | BERMAN Luca | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
119 | BRAR Sanjeet | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
120 | GANTA Vijay | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
121 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
121 | POPE Nico | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
123 | CHAN Matthew | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
124 | PAN Andrew W. | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
125 | ZHOU Kevin | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
126 | PRIEST Leighton K. | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
127 | DU Gavin J. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
128 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
128 | HOUTZ Jackson | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.