Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 19% |
| 3 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 3 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 5 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 6 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 7 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 8 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 9 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 10 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% |
| 10 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 12 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 13 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 15 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 16 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 17 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 19 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 20 | JOYCE Michaela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 21 | MCCLAIN-YU Eri M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
| 22 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 22 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 22% |
| 24 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 32% |
| 25 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 26 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
| 27 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 28 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 22% | 1% |
| 29 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 4% | |
| 30 | PAPADAKIS Lily | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 31 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 32 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 5% |
| 33 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 34 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
| 35 | WITTE Vera | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 36 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 37 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | |
| 38 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
| 39 | MCLANE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% |
| 40 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | 7% |
| 41 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% |
| 43 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 7% |
| 44 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
| 45 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% |
| 46 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 46 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 5% |
| 48 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
| 48 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 50 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 51 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% | |
| 52 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 53 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 54 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 2% |
| 55 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 56 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 57 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 3% |
| 58 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 59 | ANDERSON Nora E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 60 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 22% | 2% |
| 61 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 7% |
| 62 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
| 63 | GAO Judy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 64 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 99% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 65 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 66 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
| 67 | MAO Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 68 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | |
| 69 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 70 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 71 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 72 | WEBER Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 73 | MINOR Lindsey | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 74 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 75 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
| 76 | NGUYEN Kira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
| 77 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 78 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 78 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 99% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 80 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
| 81 | YAO Yilin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 82 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 84 | MING Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 85 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 86 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | - |
| 87 | JAMES Josephine | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 88 | NGUYEN Audrey | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 89 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 1% | |
| 90 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 91 | BOK Michelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 2% |
| 92 | MIN MAGNOLIA | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 93 | FAZZINI Angelina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 94 | ZHANG mickey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | 1% |
| 95 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
| 95 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% |
| 97 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 98 | LI Alisha | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 10% |
| 100 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 101 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 102 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 103 | HUNTER Madison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 104 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 100% | 97% | 71% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 105 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 106 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 107 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 108 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 109 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 110 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 110 | KANEVSKY Samantha | 100% | 92% | 54% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% | 1% |
| 114 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 115 | LONADIER Keira | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 116 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
| 117 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 118 | SUN Renee R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 119 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 120 | NEELAM Neha | 100% | 78% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | CHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 122 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 123 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 124 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 124 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 124 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 127 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 128 | RAI Ananya | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 129 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 130 | RAINEY Zoe-Andrea | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 131 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 132 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 133 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 133 | LE Jennifer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 135 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 136 | MESCHIA Maggie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 137 | DOERR Zoe | 100% | 99% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 138 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 139 | FENG ge | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 140 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 141 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 142 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 143 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 144 | HICKS Grace | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 145 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 145 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 147 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 148 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | - |
| 149 | PACHECO Naomi | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 150 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 151 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 151 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 153 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 154 | MEZACK Nicole | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 155 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 155 | MACEDON Gianna | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 157 | BROWN Hannah | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 158 | BURCHETT Victoria | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 159 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 159 | BALSKUS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 161 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 84% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 161 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 163 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 164 | MANCELL Hope | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 165 | XU Katelyn | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 166 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 167 | GELMAN Emily | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 168 | ANDREEV Victoria | 100% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 169 | YOON Katherine | 100% | 81% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 170 | YOU Emily | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 171 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 172 | SANTANA Mia | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 173 | YU Sheerea | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 174 | PARKS Eliana | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 175 | TRACY Samarra | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 176 | FRIEDLANDER Sarah | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 176 | MOON Seojung | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 176 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 83% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 179 | ERDMAN Giselle | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 180 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 181 | HAMILTON Nina M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 182 | MATTHEWS Hailey | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 183 | ZHU-HILL Alice A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 183 | KELLY Jenna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 185 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 186 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 87% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 187 | PROKOPEAS Grace | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 188 | KIM Lynne | 100% | 35% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 189 | SHEIN Evita | 100% | 46% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 190 | DONDISCH Andrea | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 191 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 192 | ROMANO Julia | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 193 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 194 | CAI Catelynn | 100% | 83% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 195 | POPA Catherine | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 196 | YAN Grace | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 197 | JOHN Venus | 100% | 64% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 198 | SHUKLA Tanya | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 198 | MOHEBI Neeka | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 200 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 201 | BANKULLA Misha R. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 201 | MAGALSKI Mary | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 201 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 201 | LEEN Alexandra | 100% | 79% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 201 | LORENZO Isabella | 100% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 206 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 100% | 80% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 207 | SOOHOO Claire | 100% | 70% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 207 | BLANCHARD Remy | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 209 | BARREIRO Katrina | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 209 | GORMAN Simone | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 211 | SIU Maple | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 212 | ILLESCAS Frida | 100% | 91% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 213 | GUSKA Jenn | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.