Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MARSH-SENIC Ann E. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
2 | CARTER Jane (Jane P (Hall) Carter) P. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
3 | FAGAN Margaret | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
3 | PANYI Maria | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 55% |
5 | HENNIG-TRESTMAN Bonnie L. | - | - | 8% | 40% | 42% | 9% |
6 | KASS Sara A. | 2% | 22% | 43% | 28% | 6% | |
7 | BOTELHO Lynn A. | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 42% | 10% |
8 | DREYER Nadia S. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
9 | TOTEMEIER Ann M. | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% | |
10 | DRESSEL Pamela (Pam) A. | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% | |
11 | KERR Margaret E. | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | |
12 | AMISTOSO Jeanne | 17% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
13 | VASHISHT Suparna | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
14 | GIULIANO Anne | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - |
15 | TRELOAR Allison F. | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
16 | POLLETTA Julie | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
17 | FERGUSON Diane F. | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
18 | KOPIJ Ursula | 4% | 31% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - |
19 | CHACE-ORTIZ Naneen | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
20 | LEE Claire L. | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | |
21 | WOUNDY Melissa A. | 10% | 51% | 34% | 4% | - | - |
22 | AGOSTINI Laura | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.