Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | V V V V D V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | V V D V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | MEHROTRA Anya | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | KORFONTA Jolie | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
5 | GU Sarah | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
6 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | PADHYE Tanishka | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
8 | LUO Ashley | V V D D V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
10 | CALDERA Lexi I. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
12 | KIM Zoe L. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
13 | NGUYEN Tallulah | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
14 | LIN Elaine | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
15 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
16 | WONG Alexandra R. | D V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
17 | HAFEEZ Hania | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
18 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
19 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
20 | ZHU Serene M. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
21 | LEE Rachel | V D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
22 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | DESAI Meera P. | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
24 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
25 | RUNIONS Emersyn | D V V V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
26 | NGUYEN Kira | V V V V D D | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
27 | FENG ge | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
28 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | D V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | YANG Alisa | D D V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
30 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | D V D D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
31 | LIU Nicole | D V D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
32 | JAKEL Alysa C. | D V D V D D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
33 | PEHLIVANI Zara | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
34 | HAFEEZ Hiba | V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
36 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | V V D V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
37 | LEE Yedda | V V V V D V | D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
38 | REID Anousheh | V V V V D V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
38 | BECKMAN Ana | V V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
40 | CHI Chelsea | V V D V V V | D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
41 | LAN Alice S. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
42 | ZHANG Victoria R. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
43 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | V V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
44 | PRIHODKO Nina | V D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
44 | PEELER Julia | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
46 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | D V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
47 | MIN MAGNOLIA | V V D D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
48 | CANNING Charlotte | V V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
49 | YAN Grace | D V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
50 | ELSTON Sophia | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
51 | SIMHADRI Meghana | D D V V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
52 | SHIV Avni | V D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
53 | BUSH emma | D D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
54 | AZMEH nour | D D D V V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
55 | HESS Heidi J. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
56 | YOU Isabel B. | V V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
57 | YAO Yilin | V D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
58 | LU Samantha R. | V D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
59 | YOU Emily | V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
60 | SUN Renee R. | V D D D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
61 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | D D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
62 | HSIU Elizabeth | D D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
62 | YAO Melinda | D V D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
64 | BROWN Hannah | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
65 | YU Nicole J. | V D D V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
66 | BURCHETT Victoria | V V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
66 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
68 | WITTER Catherine A. | V D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
69 | WATTANAKIT Anda | V D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
70 | KIM Jayna | D V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
71 | FURMAN Maria | V D V D V | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
72 | PATIL Amulya | D D V V V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
73 | SHARMA Sanvi | D V D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
73 | SONG Angela | D V V V D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
75 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | V V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
76 | MUELLER Emma M. | D V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
77 | LEE Claire | V D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
78 | ZHENG Linden | V D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
79 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | V D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
80 | SWENSON Nikita G. | D D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
81 | NEMETH Katherine | V D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
82 | NEELAM Neha | V V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
83 | CHANG Ella | D D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
84 | KORKIN Alice | V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
85 | HAYNES Antonia | V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
86 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | D D V V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
87 | LEE Olivia | V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
88 | POPOVICI Alina B. | D D V V D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
89 | YAO KATHARINE | D D D D V V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
90 | KUMAR Eva | V D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
91 | SPRINGER Sierra | D V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
92 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
93 | WANG Angelina | D D D D V V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
94 | SMUK Alexandra S. | V D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
94 | MARTYNOVA Diana | V D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
96 | LIN Ashley | V D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
97 | MUN Brianna K. | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
98 | HSU Adele Y. | V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
99 | LEE Camilla | D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
100 | PHUKAN Indra | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
101 | MISHIMA Audrey | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
101 | MEYER Rachel | D D V D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
103 | NELSON Grace E. | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
104 | PULLEN Ayah | D V D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
105 | PERVEZ Zaynab | D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
106 | KEE Bea Isabelle | D V D D D D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 | |
107 | HU Chelsea | V D D D D D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 | |
108 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | D D D D V D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 | |
109 | SHEN Yongen | D D D D V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 | |
109 | XU Katelyn | D D D D D V | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 | |
111 | MACEY Hadley | D D D D V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 | |
112 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | D D V D D D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 | |
113 | SHU Youshan | D D V D D D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
114 | GUAN Isabella | D D D D D V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
115 | POON Desiree | D D D D V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 | |
116 | HAU Olivia | D D V D D D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 | |
117 | BENZAN India | D D D D D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 | |
118 | DONGES Anna | D D D D D D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 | |
119 | NIEMAN Aubrey | D D D D D D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 | |
119 | TYTELL Elizabeth | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
121 | CARRIER Meredith | D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
122 | NIX Reagan | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
123 | DONDISCH Andrea | D D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
124 | PATELLI Anna Alice | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
124 | MEYER Rebecca | D D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
126 | NAIR Supriya | D D D D D D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 | |
126 | MIHILL Margaret | D D D D D D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.