Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 2 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 3 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 3 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 5 | GU Sarah | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 6 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 7 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 8 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% | |
| 9 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 10 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 11 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 27% | |
| 13 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 11% | |
| 14 | LIN Elaine | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 15 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 43% | 48% | |
| 16 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 18 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 4% |
| 19 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 20 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | LEE Rachel | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
| 23 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 46% | 36% | |
| 24 | ORTEGA Ivanna S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 25 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 40% | 37% |
| 26 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 27 | FENG ge | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 28 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 29 | YANG Alisa | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 30 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 31 | LIU Nicole | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 32 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 33 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 34 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 18% | 52% | 27% | |
| 36 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 37 | LEE Yedda | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 38 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 38 | BECKMAN Ana | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 40 | CHI Chelsea | 4% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 6% |
| 42 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 43 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | PRIHODKO Nina | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 44 | PEELER Julia | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 46 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
| 47 | MIN MAGNOLIA | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 48 | CANNING Charlotte | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 49 | YAN Grace | 4% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | ELSTON Sophia | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 51 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | SHIV Avni | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 53 | BUSH emma | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 54 | AZMEH nour | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 55 | HESS Heidi J. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 56 | YOU Isabel B. | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 57 | YAO Yilin | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | LU Samantha R. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 59 | YOU Emily | 4% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 60 | SUN Renee R. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 61 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 62 | HSIU Elizabeth | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | YAO Melinda | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 4% |
| 64 | BROWN Hannah | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | YU Nicole J. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 66 | BURCHETT Victoria | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | KIM Jayna | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | FURMAN Maria | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% | |
| 72 | PATIL Amulya | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 73 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 73 | SONG Angela | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 75 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 76 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 77 | LEE Claire | 8% | 37% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | ZHENG Linden | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 79 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 80 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 81 | NEMETH Katherine | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 82 | NEELAM Neha | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | CHANG Ella | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 84 | KORKIN Alice | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 85 | HAYNES Antonia | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 86 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 87 | LEE Olivia | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 89 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 90 | KUMAR Eva | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 91 | SPRINGER Sierra | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 92 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 93 | WANG Angelina | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 94 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 94 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 96 | LIN Ashley | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 97 | MUN Brianna K. | 1% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 98 | HSU Adele Y. | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 99 | LEE Camilla | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 100 | PHUKAN Indra | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 101 | MISHIMA Audrey | 42% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 101 | MEYER Rachel | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 103 | NELSON Grace E. | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 104 | PULLEN Ayah | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 105 | PERVEZ Zaynab | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 106 | KEE Bea Isabelle | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 107 | HU Chelsea | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 108 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 109 | SHEN Yongen | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 109 | XU Katelyn | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 111 | MACEY Hadley | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 113 | SHU Youshan | 7% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 114 | GUAN Isabella | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 115 | POON Desiree | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | HAU Olivia | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 117 | BENZAN India | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 118 | DONGES Anna | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 119 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 121 | CARRIER Meredith | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 122 | NIX Reagan | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 123 | DONDISCH Andrea | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 124 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 124 | MEYER Rebecca | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 126 | NAIR Supriya | 15% | 45% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 126 | MIHILL Margaret | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.