National Championships, Junior Olympic Championships & July NAC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Thursday, July 8, 2021 at 8:30 AM

Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LUNG Katerina 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 76%
2 LIU Jaelyn A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 48%
3 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
3 OUYANG Bridgette Z. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 76% 21%
5 SHEN Lydia 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 56%
6 CHEN Jia P. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 64%
7 SENIC Adeline 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 35%
8 YANG Iris 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 9% 1%
9 CHUSID Mikayla 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 39%
10 JING Emily 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 81%
11 EYER Hailey M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 66%
12 TAN Kaitlyn N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 46%
13 BATRA Chaahat 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 40% 9%
14 WONG Sophia M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 26% 4%
15 SULEIMAN Alena J. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
16 ZHAO Sophie L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 26%
17 JANG Kimberley 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
18 GUERRA Sofia E. 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 33%
19 LI Rachel Y. 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 27%
20 CHO Rebecca H. 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 38%
21 PEVZNER Victoria 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 58%
22 PENG Amber L. 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 33% 6%
23 CHANG Elizabeth 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
24 SIMONOV Dasha 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 27% 3%
25 SUN Ruoxi 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 29%
26 GU EMILY 100% 100% 96% 71% 27% 4%
27 ORVANANOS Anice 100% 100% 98% 84% 45% 7%
28 LIU Angel(Daying) 100% 99% 94% 73% 37% 8%
29 RANDOLPH Piper 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 26% 3%
30 PANT Anisha 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 4%
31 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 27% 4%
32 FEDELI Caterina S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 33%
33 GOOR Viviene E. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 4%
34 SUN Chien-Yu 100% 100% 99% 91% 53% 12%
35 CHEN Allison V. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 21%
36 ZHANG Alina C. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
37 ROY Layla 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 9% 1%
37 ZHOU Catherine 100% 100% 94% 65% 17% 1% -
39 CANNON Lira J. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
39 KIM Rachel 100% 99% 82% 43% 11% 1% -
41 MEI Sarah 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
42 KOSTELNY Alexis 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 70% 12%
43 MARKOVSKY Nina 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2% -
44 KOSLOW Amicie 100% 100% 95% 75% 37% 7% -
45 SOLDATOVA Maria 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 20% 2%
46 NIKOLIC Alexandra 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
47 FU Qihan 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
48 NISSINOFF Alexandra 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 25%
49 SEO IRENE Y. 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 13%
50 MI Aileen 100% 97% 79% 46% 16% 3% -
51 CHOW Annabelle 100% 100% 94% 73% 37% 9% 1%
52 CUI Amy 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 39% 6%
53 CHEW Alexis T. 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 4%
54 AMR HOSSNY Sara 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 55% 15%
55 VO Bao-Vy 100% 97% 77% 40% 11% 1% -
56 LEE Lavender 100% 100% 98% 89% 61% 23% 2%
57 HOBSON Ava 100% 98% 85% 50% 15% 1% -
58 NAMGALAURI Mariam 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
59 OTEYZA Camille 100% 99% 85% 46% 11% 1%
60 LIN Victoria T. 100% 74% 32% 7% 1% -
61 LIU Joy Zhaoyi 100% 100% 100% 96% 66% 20%
62 HAYES Alyssa R. 100% 91% 59% 22% 4% -
63 CHARALEL Jessica 100% 98% 75% 34% 7% 1% -
64 WANDJI Anais 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 14%
65 WILLIS Fletcher L. 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
66 LUO Sandra J. 100% 99% 92% 67% 31% 7% -
67 BEAVER Hannah 100% 98% 81% 43% 10% 1%
68 YANG Lingting 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1%
69 ZULUETA Catherine 100% 96% 73% 33% 6% -
70 HWANG Alison 100% 98% 84% 51% 17% 2%
71 WANG Jasmine 100% 99% 85% 47% 12% 1%
72 BRANDON Fionnoula 100% 83% 44% 13% 2% - -
73 LI Sophia M. 100% 99% 86% 51% 16% 2% -
74 CHEN Chloe I. 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 6% -
75 SHMAY Anastasia 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
76 SHA Yi Ling 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2% -
76 LUH Mia P. 100% 78% 35% 8% 1% - -
78 ZHENG Julie 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 14% 1%
79 LEVY Avery 100% 75% 30% 6% - - -
80 LIPKOVITZ Rivka 100% 87% 35% 6% - -
81 GANDLURI Sreehitha 100% 46% 7% - - -
82 BEAVER Kaitlyn 100% 92% 64% 26% 5% - -
83 CHEN Renee 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 4% -
84 MANIKTALA Prisha 100% 98% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
85 ZHANG Eunice 100% 97% 81% 45% 14% 2% -
86 SU Michelle 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 15% 1%
87 JIANG Claire 100% 71% 26% 5% - - -
88 ZHUANG Christina 100% 100% 100% 97% 74% 20% 1%
89 BENNETT Abigail 100% 71% 25% 3% - - -
90 BIODROWICZ Julia 100% 100% 97% 80% 42% 8% -
91 SHIM Grace 100% 78% 39% 11% 2% - -
92 VAUGHAN Norah 100% 87% 51% 16% 3% - -
93 FUNG Emma 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
94 ZHANG Selena 100% 79% 37% 9% 1% - -
94 MADSEN Ansley 100% 87% 47% 10% 1% - -
96 STRUGAR Steliana 100% 84% 47% 15% 3% -
97 KOKES Gwendolen 100% 99% 87% 46% 11% 1%
98 PARK Leah 100% 83% 32% 4% - -
99 LENZ Zoe N. 100% 95% 66% 16% 2% -
100 ROHRING Anna 100% 63% 20% 3% - -
101 BAWA Sahana 100% 98% 70% 27% 4% -
102 LEE Fiona E. 100% 85% 48% 16% 3% -
103 SULTER Aurelie 100% 74% 31% 7% 1% - -
104 RAO Sonia D. 100% 97% 78% 42% 13% 2% -
105 KOZLOWSKI Maya M. 100% 86% 49% 15% 2% - -
106 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 100% 61% 20% 4% - - -
106 BASSIK Eva 100% 98% 81% 43% 11% 1% -
108 UMAP Arna 100% 99% 90% 60% 22% 4% -
109 ENRILE Erica 100% 84% 41% 8% 1% - -
110 HAN Crystal 100% 98% 87% 56% 22% 4% -
111 COOPER Piper W. 100% 98% 85% 56% 23% 5% -
112 LAI Sophia 100% 79% 36% 8% 1% - -
113 PAULUS Sloane 100% 65% 23% 4% - - -
114 TRACZ Calleigh D. 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% - -
115 HAN Ashley 100% 99% 85% 48% 14% 2% -
116 YAN Noelle 100% 89% 53% 18% 3% - -
117 HIMMEL Alexandra 100% 19% 1% - - -
118 CASTANEDA Keira 100% 96% 77% 40% 11% 1%
119 CHOI Kailyn 100% 90% 54% 16% 2% -
120 LI Irina 100% 75% 32% 7% 1% - -
121 BOLES Amanda X. 100% 95% 73% 35% 9% 1% -
122 SHUM Maya 100% 91% 59% 22% 4% - -
122 PAULUS Isabella 100% 77% 33% 8% 1% - -
124 QUINN Anna 100% 32% 3% - - -
125 MU Allison 100% 59% 17% 3% - - -
126 YU Jane 100% 25% 2% - - - -
127 BROWN Lily 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.