Philadelphia, PA - Philadelphia, PA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% |
2 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
3 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 21% |
5 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
6 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% |
7 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
8 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
9 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 39% |
10 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
11 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | |
12 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
13 | BATRA Chaahat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
14 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
15 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
16 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | |
17 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% |
18 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 33% | |
19 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% | |
20 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | |
21 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
22 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 6% |
23 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
24 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
25 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | |
26 | GU EMILY | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 27% | 4% | |
27 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 7% | |
28 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
29 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 26% | 3% |
30 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
31 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
32 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 33% |
33 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
34 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | 12% | |
35 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
36 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
37 | ROY Layla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
37 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 17% | 1% | - |
39 | CANNON Lira J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
39 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 99% | 82% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
41 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
42 | KOSTELNY Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 12% |
43 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | KOSLOW Amicie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 7% | - |
45 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
46 | NIKOLIC Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
47 | FU Qihan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
48 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 25% | |
49 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
50 | MI Aileen | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
51 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
52 | CUI Amy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 6% |
53 | CHEW Alexis T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
54 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 15% |
55 | VO Bao-Vy | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
56 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 2% |
57 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 15% | 1% | - |
58 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
59 | OTEYZA Camille | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
60 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
61 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | 20% | |
62 | HAYES Alyssa R. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
63 | CHARALEL Jessica | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% |
65 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
66 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
67 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
68 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
69 | ZULUETA Catherine | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
70 | HWANG Alison | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
71 | WANG Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
72 | BRANDON Fionnoula | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
73 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
74 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
75 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
76 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | - |
76 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 78% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
78 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
79 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
80 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 87% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
81 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 46% | 7% | - | - | - | |
82 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
83 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
84 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
85 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
86 | SU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
87 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
88 | ZHUANG Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 20% | 1% |
89 | BENNETT Abigail | 100% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% | - |
91 | SHIM Grace | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
92 | VAUGHAN Norah | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
93 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
94 | ZHANG Selena | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
94 | MADSEN Ansley | 100% | 87% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
96 | STRUGAR Steliana | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
97 | KOKES Gwendolen | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 11% | 1% | |
98 | PARK Leah | 100% | 83% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
99 | LENZ Zoe N. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 16% | 2% | - | |
100 | ROHRING Anna | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
101 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 98% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
102 | LEE Fiona E. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
103 | SULTER Aurelie | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
104 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
105 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
106 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
106 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - |
108 | UMAP Arna | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
109 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
110 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
111 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
112 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
113 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
114 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
115 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
116 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
117 | HIMMEL Alexandra | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
118 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
119 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | |
120 | LI Irina | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
121 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
122 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
122 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 77% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
124 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
125 | MU Allison | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
126 | YU Jane | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
127 | BROWN Lily | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.